What Is the Origin of Born Repulsion in Atoms?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Born repulsion in atoms, characterized by a short-range repulsion energy term proportional to 1/r^n. This concept is referenced in solid-state physics literature, particularly in Max Born's _Atomic Physics_ 6th edition, where it is noted that the form b/r^n has been effective but lacks a theoretical derivation. Participants confirm that the Born repulsion is a functional form chosen for convenience in calculations, rather than derived from a specific theoretical framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic physics principles
  • Familiarity with solid-state physics concepts
  • Knowledge of mathematical modeling in physics
  • Basic grasp of potential energy functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of short-range forces in atomic interactions
  • Explore the derivation and applications of potential energy functions in solid-state physics
  • Study the implications of Born repulsion in crystal lattice structures
  • Investigate alternative models for atomic repulsion beyond the Born model
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in atomic physics, solid-state physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of atomic interactions.

smimth
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello,

I am curious about born repulsion of atoms, ie short range repulsion energy term proportional to 1/r^n. I find this in many solid state type books and they all call it the born repulsion and give no hints to its derivation or where it comes from. In _Atomic Physics_ 6th ed. by Max Born, I find "a law of the form b/r^n has been tried with good success..." in chap. IX but gives no hints to the origin of this form. Is anyone aware of a reference where the theory behind this form is described? Perhaps it is even in _Atomic Physics_ but my browsing has not found it yet.

Thank you,
smimth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no theory --- it is purely a functional form for a short-range repulsion that is convenient. It turns out that usually the exact form of the interaction does not matter, so one just picks something which makes the algebra simpler.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K