What is the period for an oscillator with a net force of fx = -cx^3?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the period of an oscillator described by a net force of fx = -cx^3. The original poster seeks to calculate the time for the body to move from x=0 to x=A and express the period in terms of A, m, and c.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the net force and the period, questioning the correct application of the period formula T=2π√(m/k) and whether k can be derived from the given force.
  • There are attempts to apply energy conservation principles, with discussions on how to incorporate potential energy into the calculations.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations and the implications of their substitutions, particularly regarding the integration process and variable changes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the integration and variable substitution. There is a recognition of the need to derive the period for a non-simple harmonic oscillator, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the integral involved and the challenge of integrating expressions that include square roots. There is also mention of constraints related to homework rules and the necessity of expressing the final answer in specific terms.

TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a certain oscillator the net force on the body with mass m is given by fx = -cx^3.

One-quarter of a period is the time for the body to move from x=0 to x=A. Calculate this time and hence the period.

Express your answer in terms of the variables A, m, and c.

Homework Equations



Ux = (cx^4)/4 < Calculated from previous question part

T=2 pi sqrt(m/k)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have got using the T equation, as far as:

= 8 pi sqrt (m/something)

but I am not quite sure what he something is.

Any ideas?

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please show your calculations and reasoning that led you to that equation for the period?
 
I think the I made a mistake

I did 1/4T = 2 pi sqrt (m/something)
getting T = (2*4)pi sqrt(m/something)

I don't think that 4 should have been in there. :blushing:

Thus

T = 2*pi sqrt(m/something)

TFM
 
Is the 'something', which is k, fx = -cx^3. since this is the force on the mass, but is it the restoring force?

TFM
 
Looking at the question in the book, I am using the wrong equation.

In a hint in the book (But not on Mastering Physics), I have to use the energy equation

E = 0.5mv^2 + 0.5kx^2,

and insert the potential energy calculated in previous qauestion:

(cx^4)/4

I am not sure what part it replaces though...

you then solve for v, replace v with dx/dt, separate the variables with x on one side, t on the other, then intetgrate then use u = x/a

Currently, I just need to find out where do I insert the potential Energy? does it replace the E at the beginning of the equation?

TFM
 
TFM said:
Currently, I just need to find out where do I insert the potential Energy? does it replace the E at the beginning of the equation?

TFM

No. E represents the total energy. You want to replace the potential energy term. You now know that E represents total energy and that 1/2mv^2 represents kinetic. There is only one other term in the equation correct?
 
TFM said:
T=2 pi sqrt(m/k)

No, that isn't right. If the amplitude of the oscillation is a, then the time period is simply,

[tex]T = \int dt = 4 \int_0^a \frac{dx}{v}[/tex]

where v is the velocity and as the question states, one-quarter of a period is time to move from 0 to a.

Since the total energy T+V = E is constant, you have a relation between v and x, and so can integrate and find the time period. Can you take it from here?
 
TFM said:
.you then solve for v, replace v with dx/dt, separate the variables with x on one side, t on the other, then intetgrate then use u = x/a

I got E = 0.5mv^2 + (cx^4)/4

E - 0.5 mv^2 = (cx^4)/4

I have solved for v

v = sqrt((2((cx^4)/4 - E))/m)

Replacing V with dx/dt

dx/dt = sqrt((2((cx^4)/4 - E))/m)

1/dt = sqrt((2((cx^4)/4 - E))/m)dx

this seems a very complicated intergral, though? Is it correct so far?

TFM
 
Hey,

I'm stuck on the same problem, this is one of the ways I have tried to solve it;

[tex]E=(mv^2)/2+(kx^2)/2[/tex]

Let the potential energy be equal to zero which means all the energy is kinetic, thus all the potential energy is now kinetic energy (assuming no other forces are acting) giving;

[tex]kx^2/2=mv^2/2[/tex]

letting [tex]kx^2/2=cx^4/4[/tex] gives,

[tex]cx^4/4=mv^2/2[/tex] solving for v gives,

[tex]v=\sqrt{cx^4/2m}[/tex] then taking the integral,

[tex]T=4\int 1/v[/tex]

[tex]T=4(-1/x)\sqrt{2m/c}[/tex] which is negative and time can't be negative! where have I gone wrong?

I thought a way round it would be to square and square root the -1/x and combine it with the rest,

[tex]T=\sqrt{2m/cx^2}[/tex] then placing the integral limits in would give,

[tex]T=\sqrt{2m/cA^2}[/tex]

Is this an ok thing to do, it seems like cheating to me.

Thanks for any help.
 
  • #10
First, have you seen the Latex tutorial for this forum? It's a really easy way to display equations.


TFM said:
I got E = 0.5mv^2 + (cx^4)/4

E - 0.5 mv^2 = (cx^4)/4

I have solved for v

v = sqrt((2((cx^4)/4 - E))/m)

Right.

Replacing V with dx/dt

dx/dt = sqrt((2((cx^4)/4 - E))/m)

1/dt = sqrt((2((cx^4)/4 - E))/m)dx

this seems a very complicated intergral, though? Is it correct so far?

TFM

Yeah, looks right. To get the dependence on A, m and c, change your variable of integration and make it dimensionless.

This way, the integral will only be a numerical constant, and you'll have the dependence on A,m and c.
 
  • #11
siddharth said:
First, have you seen the Latex tutorial for this forum? It's a really easy way to display equations.

No, I have never geard of Latex before. Is there a link to it?

siddharth said:
Yeah, looks right. To get the dependence on A, m and c, change your variable of integration and make it dimensionless.

This way, the integral will only be a numerical constant, and you'll have the dependence on A,m and c.

I take it I should change dx, but what do I change it into?

TFM
 
  • #12
TFM said:
No, I have never geard of Latex before. Is there a link to it?

See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997".

I take it I should change dx, but what do I change it into?
TFM

Here's a hint.

When v=0, E = (ca^4)/4, right? But you know energy is conserved. So, substitute for E in terms of a. Then, you need to remove a from the limits in the integral. Then, what substitution is immediately obvious?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
I'm not sure if I have gone about this the right way:

[tex]0=\sqrt{\frac{2}{m}*(\frac{cx^4}{4}-\frac{ca^4}{4})}[/tex]

?

TFM
 
  • #14
TFM said:
I'm not sure if I have gone about this the right way:

[tex]0=\sqrt{\frac{2}{m}*(\frac{cx^4}{4}-\frac{ca^4}{4})}[/tex]

?

TFM

No. How did you get that?

[tex]E = \frac{mv^2}{2} + \frac{cx^4}{4}[/tex]

Note that E is constant!

when x=a, v=0, so that [tex]E=\frac{ca^4}{4}[/tex]

Now use this in your equation for the time period. I think you should be able to get the answer from here.
 
  • #15
My time period equation was:

[tex]T=2*\pi\*\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}[/tex]

Where does the E fit in?

TFM
 
  • #16
TFM said:
My time period equation was:

[tex]T=2*\pi\*\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}[/tex]

Where does the E fit in?

TFM

But, that is true only for a simple harmonic oscillator, where the potential is of the form kx^2!

The whole point of the previous posts was to derive what the time period will be when it is not simple harmonic. In this case, the time period will depend on the amplitude.

You were on the right track at Post #11. What went wrong?
 
  • #17
So what I need to do is:

[tex]\frac{1}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{m}(\frac{cm^4}{4} - E)} dx[/tex]

Which I can cancel down to:

[tex]\frac{1}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{cx^4}{2m} - \frac{2E}{m}} dx[/tex]

Replacing E with

[tex]\frac{ca^4}{4}[/tex]

giving:

[tex]\frac{1}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{cx^4}{2m} - \frac{2(\frac{ca^4}{4})}{m}} dx[/tex]

So far, so good?

TFM
 
  • #18
I have now reduced it down to:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{dt} = \int \sqrt{\frac{c(x^4 - a^4)}{2m}} dx[/tex]

Is this Correct?

TFM
 
  • #19
TFM said:
I have now reduced it down to:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{dt} = \int \sqrt{\frac{c(x^4 - a^4)}{2m}} dx[/tex]

Is this Correct?

TFM

Yes. Rewriting what you wrote,

[tex]T = 4 \int_0^a \sqrt{\frac{2m}{c(x^4-a^4)}} dx = 4 \sqrt {\frac{2m}{ca^4}} \int_0^a \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{(x/a)^4 - 1)}}\right) dx[/tex]

Now, what is the obvious substitution to make, to reduce the intergal to just a number, and find the relation of T with a,m and c?
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Would an acceptable substitution be v = x/a, where v is a random letter, giving:

[tex]T = 4\sqrt{\frac{2m}{ca^4}}\int^1_0 (\sqrt{\frac{1}{v^4 - 1}}) \frac{dv}{a}[/tex]

TFM

Edit: Forgot to change limits

Using v = x/a, x = 0, a

Limits are 0 and 1
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Which in turn can be reduced to:

[tex]T = \frac{4}{a} \sqrt{\frac{2m}{ca^4}} \int^1_0 \sqrt{\frac{1}{v^4 - 1}} dv[/tex]

I could intergrate it easier without the square root, though, any way to remove it?

(without the square root:

[tex]\int v^-^4 - 1^-^1 = \frac{v^-^3}{3} - 1[/tex])

TFM
 
  • #22
Any help/Ideas/Assitance...

TFM?
 
  • #23
Whats the best way to integrate:

[tex]\int\sqrt{\frac{1}{v^4 - 1}} dv[/tex]

?

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

TFM
 
  • #24
TFM said:
Whats the best way to integrate:

[tex]\int\sqrt{\frac{1}{v^4 - 1}} dv[/tex]

?

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

TFM

I can't see any obvious technique. Note that, you don't need to evaluate this integral to find the dependence on A,m and c, because it's only a constant.
 
  • #25
I entered:

[tex]T= \frac{4}{A}\sqrt{\frac{2m}{cA^4}}[/tex]

But it was incorrect - any ideas. If the intergrals a constant, surely it should dissapear?

TFM
 
  • #26
siddharth said:
Yes. Rewriting what you wrote,

[tex]T = 4 \int_0^a \sqrt{\frac{2m}{c(x^4-a^4)}} dx = 4 \sqrt {\frac{2m}{ca^4}} \int_0^a \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{(x/a)^4 - 1)}}\right) dx[/tex]

Some sign problem seems to have crept in, probably in the post just before this. The quantity under the sqrt sign is negative. It's been carried over up to the integral in the last post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K