What is the Phase Constant for a Simple Harmonic Oscillator with Given Graphs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter foundAnAnswer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Phase
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the phase constant of a simple harmonic oscillator using its position and velocity graphs. The position function is given as x(t) = xmcos(ωt + ϕ) and the velocity function as v(t) = -ωxmsin(ωt + ϕ). The user initially attempted to equate the position and velocity values at t=0 but encountered confusion. Ultimately, they found that using the ratio of velocity to position, adjusted for angular frequency, led to the correct phase constant calculation. The final answer for the phase constant was determined to be approximately 1.01 radians after accounting for the phase shift.
foundAnAnswer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part (a) of the figure below is a partial graph of the position function x(t) for a simple harmonic oscillator with an angular frequency of 1.35 rad/s; Part (b) of the figure is a partial graph of the corresponding velocity function v(t). The vertical axis scales are set by xs = 6.5 cm and vs = 7.0 cm/s. What is the phase constant of the SHM if the position function x(t) is given by the form x = xmcos(ωt + ϕ)?

15-20.gif


Homework Equations


x = xmcos(ωt + ϕ)
v = -ωxmsin(ωt + ϕ)

The Attempt at a Solution



For the X vs. t graph the line crosses t=0 when x = 2.6. For the V vs. t graph the line crosses t=0 when v=-5.6.

I thought then I could just plug all the number in and find out when they are equal

2.6 = 6.5cos(1.35*0+ϕ)
-5.6 = -8.775sin(1.35*0+ϕ)

I subtracted 2.6 from both sides for the first equation and added 5.6 to both sides for the second. I then set them equal. I used my calculator to attempt to solve them.

Looking at them separately it looks like it should be 1.15 radians for X and .69 radians for V (Roughly).

I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps I shouldn't be reading the graph like I am. or I am simply reading it wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found an answer. I don't understand why this is correct, but dividing velocity by position gives the following

v/x = tan-1(\frac{Velocity @ t=0}{Position @ t=0 TIMES Angular Frequency})

So that leaves


tan-1(\frac{-5.6}{2.6 * 1.35}) = -1.01

I think then since it is shifted I changed it to positive 1.01.

That answer was taken as correct.
 
One equation represents position and the other represents velocity. Since the units are different, you can never "set them equal."
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K