What is the Point of Zero Electric Field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the point of zero electric field between two charges, q1 = -2.3 µC and q2 = 6.80 µC, using the equation E = k * Q / r². Participants clarify that the forces acting on a hypothetical test charge must be equal and opposite for the electric field to be zero. The correct setup involves equating the forces from both charges, leading to the equation q1/x² = q2/(d+x)², where d is the distance between the charges. The equilibrium position is confirmed to be outside the two charges due to their opposite signs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the concept of hypothetical test charges
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of the constants involved in electrostatics, specifically k (Coulomb's constant)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric field lines and their relation to charge distributions
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of charge signs on electric field direction
  • Review problem-solving techniques for electrostatic equilibrium scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields and forces between charged particles.

Keithkent09
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure below (q1 = -2.3 µC, q2 = 6.80 µC), determine the point (other than infinity) at which the electric field is zero. (Figure is attached)

Homework Equations


E=k*Q/r^2
F-k*q_1*q_2/r^2
F-Q*E

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought about finding where the force is zero and then the electric field would be zero because of F=Q*E. But I did not think that that was correct.
 

Attachments

  • p23-13alt.gif
    p23-13alt.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 923
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Keith! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
Keithkent09 said:
I thought about finding where the force is zero and then the electric field would be zero because of F=Q*E. But I did not think that that was correct.

No, that's fine … F = qE, so they're zero together. :smile:

(btw, i think it's usually little q for charge, except big Q for the charge of a black hole :wink:)
 
Alright I get that part.
So then I set the two forces equal to each other and k*q_1*q_2/x^2=k*q_2*q_1/(d-x)^2
Is that the correct set up?
 
Keithkent09 said:
So then I set the two forces equal to each other and k*q_1*q_2/x^2=k*q_2*q_1/(d-x)^2
Is that the correct set up?

erm :redface: … what about q (or Q) ? :wink:
 
Um you mean the F=qE part?
If that is the case then the q is just the overall charge right and I am given two qs so I am not sure what that translates as...
 
Keithkent09 said:
…the q is just the overall charge right and I am given two qs so I am not sure what that translates as...

No, q isn't "the overall charge", it's a hypothetical "test" charge.

Your …
Keithkent09 said:
k*q_1*q_2/x^2=k*q_2*q_1/(d-x)^2

… cancels out to give 1/x2 = 1/(d-x)2.

You need the forces on a hypothetical charge q to be equal and opposite.
 
Yeah I did that earlier and I got x to be .5 using d=1 meter.
However this answer is not correct. Was my algebra just bad or is there something more to the problem. Sorry I am just having a tough time.
 
Keithkent09 said:
Yeah I did that earlier and I got x to be .5 using d=1 meter.
However this answer is not correct. Was my algebra just bad or is there something more to the problem. Sorry I am just having a tough time.

That's because your k*q_1*q_2/x^2=k*q_2*q_1/(d-x)^2 is wrong.

You need the force on q from q1 to be equal to the force on q from q2
 
So that leaves me with q_1/x^2=q_2/(d-x)^2?
 
  • #10
Yes. :smile:
 
  • #11
Alright good. I got x=.57. This does not seem to be the right answer and I think this leaves me to be in between the two charges instead of to the left of them. What is the next step or did I do something incorrectly again?
 
  • #12
ah, they have opposite charge, so the equilibrium position will be outside, so you need to use d+x instead of d-x. :smile:
 
  • #13
Do I include the negative signs for the charges or is it the absolute value of those charges I cannot remember?
 
  • #14
Good morning Keith! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

To find the direction of a force, you must include the sign of the charge. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K