What Is the Probability of Rolling Neither a Doublet Nor a Sum of 10?

  • Thread starter Thread starter royalewithchz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dice Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the probability of rolling a pair of dice such that neither a doublet nor a sum of 10 appears. The discussion centers around the application of probability laws and the interpretation of the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods for calculating the probability, including brute force and algebraic approaches. There is a discussion on the correct application of de Morgan's laws and the inclusion-exclusion principle. Some participants question the interpretation of "neither ... nor ..." in the context of probability.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various interpretations and methods. Some have provided guidance on using inclusion-exclusion properly, while others are clarifying the implications of the phrasing used in the problem statement. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the correct interpretation of terms related to probability. The discussion reflects a mix of algebraic and combinatorial approaches, with some participants noting potential misinterpretations of the problem's requirements.

royalewithchz
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A pair of dice is rolled once, what is the probability that neither a doublet nor the sum of 10 will appear

Homework Equations



P(A) = 1 - P(A')

Demorgans law
(AUB)c = Ac ∩ B c


The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to do the solution through brute force and listing out all the possible scenarios:
(1,1), (1,2), (1,3) ... (6,6) and doing it like that. But i wanted a more algebraic approach so I tried this:

Let A = is a doublet
Let B = sum of dices is 10

so then what I am looking for is

P(Ac U Bc)

and applying demorgans

P(Ac U Bc) = P(A∩B )c

using the law that Ac = 1 - A

I got the final easy equation

1 - P(A ∩ B )

solving for this

P(A) = 6/36 ...(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6)
P(B) = 3/36 ...(4,6), (5,5),(6,4)

plug in numbers

1 - (6/36)*(3/36) != the answer of 7/9

Apparently, math lies, j.k. Can someone let me know what i am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
royalewithchz said:

Homework Statement



A pair of dice is rolled once, what is the probability that neither a doublet nor the sum of 10 will appear

Homework Equations



P(A) = 1 - P(A')

Demorgans law
(AUB)c = Ac ∩ B c


The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to do the solution through brute force and listing out all the possible scenarios:
(1,1), (1,2), (1,3) ... (6,6) and doing it like that. But i wanted a more algebraic approach so I tried this:

Let A = is a doublet
Let B = sum of dices is 10

so then what I am looking for is

P(Ac U Bc)

and applying demorgans

P(Ac U Bc) = P(A∩B )c

using the law that Ac = 1 - A

I got the final easy equation

1 - P(A ∩ B )

solving for this

P(A) = 6/36 ...(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6)
P(B) = 3/36 ...(4,6), (5,5),(6,4)

plug in numbers

1 - (6/36)*(3/36) != the answer of 7/9

Apparently, math lies, j.k. Can someone let me know what i am doing wrong?

Use inclusion-exclusion properly:
\text{P}(A \cup B) = \text{P}(A) + \text{P}(B) - \text{P}(A \cap B) = 6/36 + 3/36 - 1/36.
 
Thats a clean method.

Can I ask you why deMorgans doesn't work in this scenario?
 
royalewithchz said:
Let A = is a doublet
Let B = sum of dices is 10

so then what I am looking for is

P(Ac U Bc)
Not so.
neither a doublet nor the sum of 10
 
royalewithchz said:
Thats a clean method.

Can I ask you why deMorgans doesn't work in this scenario?

It does work, and it is essentially what I used:
\text{desired answer} = \text{P}(A^c \cap B^c) = 1 - \text{P}(A \cup B)
If you evaluate ##\text{P}(A \cup B)## correctly you will get the right answer.
 
OHHHHH...my initial set up was wrong

this: P(Ac∩Bc)

and not this: P(AcUBc)

the phrase "neither a nor b"

confused me. I thought nor implied OR not AND.
 
royalewithchz said:
I thought nor implied OR not AND.
"neither ... nor ..." is the same as "not ... and not ...".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K