What is the purpose of a voltage divider in electric circuit analysis?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a voltage divider in the context of electric circuit analysis, particularly as it relates to a lab experiment involving graphite as a resistive material. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the measurements taken with digital multimeters (DMMs) and the implications of the circuit setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between the incomplete circuit and the voltage measurements observed. They question the nature of the circuit formed by the DMMs and graphite, and whether the branches can be considered in parallel.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion, providing clarifications about the circuit's completeness and the behavior of voltage in relation to resistance. There is an exploration of the implications of Ohm's Law in this context, with some participants suggesting that the current path is primarily through the DMMs.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that they have not yet covered the formulas for resistors in series or parallel in their class, which may be influencing their understanding of the circuit analysis required for their lab data.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please see the picture below.

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2505/capturecfk.png

The title of this section of my lab is "Voltage divider". Now I have taken this class before =(. But anyways I know that there is a whole voltage divider formula for resistors in series and parallel. I however never remembered to memorize the formula because it was much easier for me to just calculate the voltage across each resistor.

We haven't gotten to resistors in this class yet or even the formula for resistors in parallel or series and how to find their equivalent resistances. Now I'm probably sure that I'll need to this information to analyze the data which I took.

The data which I was required to take required me to do this:
1) Fill in the shape with graphite from a pencil.
2) Take one DMM, set it to measure resistance, and place the red probe at A and the black probe at B.

Now I know that a DMM applies a voltage to measure resistance, so this is the purpose of doing this.

3) Take a second DMM and set it to measure voltage place the black probe at B with the other black probe.
4) Take the red probe from the second DMM and place it at the voltage contacts (the things labeled V1', V2'... V1, V2...) and measure the data.

Analyze your results.

Homework Equations



R = \frac{ρl}{A}

Where:
R = resistance
ρ = resistivity (in the case of graphite ρ≈1*10^{-5} Ωm
l = length
A = cross sectional area

A = wh

Where:
w = width
h = height (thickness of the graphite layer)

V = IR

Where:
V = voltage
I = current
R = resistance

The Attempt at a Solution



Now I'm kind of confused about the data which I received. The figure is not a complete circuit (V1' contact is not connected to V2' contact etc.). I understand that a voltage source is applied between A and B. But sense it's not a complete circuit there should be no current going through to the V1' V2'... etc contacts. Yet I can measure a voltage difference between the V1' V2'... contacts and B. Why is this?

Maybe I'm over thinking this. Circuits is a lot easier when you have an actual circuit. I however seem to be confused when I have figures and not circuits without physical wires and resistors.

Thanks for any help you can provide!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You actually do have a circuit. The DVMs, their red and black leads, and the graphite form the circuit.
 
So do I have a complete circuit though? Is current traveling down to all branches? The branches aren't connected so are the resistors (the graphite branches) really in parallel?

Thanks for any help!
 
No, the branches are not in parallel. It's only a complete circuit where you are connecting the DVM.

It looks like the purpose of the voltmeter measurements is to measure the potential difference between points along the central, vertical path.
 
Well as you get further away from the A and B contacts shouldn't the voltage increase because the resistance is increasing?
 
No. If you are thinking of Ohm's Law, V=IR, what you say could be true if the current were the same through each branch to the different Vx contacts.

The main circuit (and current path) is the ohmeter DVM and the path from A to B. Very little current should go up any of the paths to the Vx contacts to where the voltmeter DVM is connected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K