What is the purpose of defining the matter tensor in general relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Proof.Beh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition and purpose of the matter tensor in general relativity (GR). The matter tensor is represented as a scalar field, specifically -ρ₀, which serves as a convenient approximation for modeling matter as a distribution of energy. This approach simplifies the complexities of energy storage within matter. Additionally, the discussion highlights that GR accommodates stress-energy tensors for various fields, indicating that any Lagrangian field theory can be represented in Einstein's equations through its associated stress-energy tensor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with scalar fields and their applications
  • Knowledge of stress-energy tensors in physics
  • Basic concepts of Lagrangian field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of scalar fields in general relativity
  • Study the derivation and application of stress-energy tensors
  • Explore Lagrangian field theory and its implications in GR
  • Investigate the relationship between energy distribution and matter in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of gravitational theories and field theories.

Proof.Beh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Why we define the matter tensor to this form '
T_m.JPG
' on general relativity?
Is it a physical supposal only? Or we can explain a mathematical proof for it?

Thanks.
-----------
Mr Beh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this expression ignores the pressure terms, so it's not quite right as written.

The Lagrangian density representing matter, though, is just a scalar field, [itex]-\rho_0[/itex] according to my recent readings. As to why a scalar field is used for matter. I think that's because that's a convenient approximation. We model matter by some distribution of energy - when you stretch matter, doing work, this energy is stored somewhere. Rather than obsess about exactly where and in what form this energy is stored, the usual approximation is to say that this energy is uniformly distributed - this gives a scalar field approximation.

GR also allows one to use stress-energy tensors for other sorts of fields (Dirac fields, and spin-1 fields for example). The ultimate point is that any sort of Lagrangian field is going to have a stress-energy tensor, so any sort of Lagrangian field theory is going to be representable in Einstein's equation by it's associated stress-energy tensor.
 
Thanks for your beautiful answer,

But note that these approximations (according to you) that we see at relativity and others, such as field theory of Nordstrom, for probability of QM are valid and we must try to solve the their problemes instead of extension QM (& string theory).

All the best,
Mr Beh
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K