What is the reaction force of centripetal force

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force, such as the tension in a rope, is responsible for maintaining circular motion, while the reaction force to this tension is the force exerted by the rope's molecules. In a non-inertial frame, centrifugal force is considered a pseudo-force because it arises from the observer's rotating perspective rather than an actual force acting on the object. The discussion clarifies that while tension provides the centripetal force, centrifugal force does not cancel it out; instead, it reflects the experience of being in a rotating frame. The conversation emphasizes that Newton's laws remain valid, as the forces balance out in the appropriate frames of reference. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of circular motion.
Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
According to Newton's 3rd law, force exists in pair. When I attach a ball to a rope and rotate it, I am giving the ball an centripetal force to keep it moving in circular motion, so is the tension in the string the reaction force I am asking?

I also want to ask about the reason why centrifugal force is considered as a pseudo-force. My explanation is that when you stand on the ball (imagine), you experience both the centripetal force (because you are rotating with the ball) and the centrifugal force (because you feel a force pushing you outward), but noting is actually providing the centrifugal force, and this also makes the rotating frame of reference an non-inertial frame. Is it correct?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Centripetal force is not a new kind of force . It only refers to that force which is reponsible for circular motion of an object - In this case , the tension .

*In inertial frame -
Tension is not equal to some other force mw2r . Acceleration is caused due to tension and this tension is simply equal to m*a , and a = w2r .

*In non inertial frame of the ball , you now add a pseudo force , simply following Newton's law for the non-inertial frame .
You call this force the centrifugal force .

Zynoakib said:
My explanation is that when you stand on the ball (imagine), you experience both the centripetal force (because you are rotating with the ball) and the centrifugal force (because you feel a force pushing you outward), but the centrifugal force should theoretically cancel the centripetal force, making the circular motion impossible and violating the law of motion (because you are still rotating with the ball), which also makes the rotating frame of reference an non-inertial frame. Is it correct?

It doesn't make the circular motion impossible . Would you consider your accelerating car ( from inertial frame ) to be moving while sitting in it ( a non inertial frame ) ?
Now , coming to your question , if you sat on the ball , would you see the ball accelerating ? As you said , Fnet = 0 and I just said , a =0 .

So is Newton's law being invalidated ?

*Just so you know , there's a like button near the bottom which you can press if somebody's post helps .:cool:
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
Just to check my concept, in inertial frame where F = ma is obeyed, there is no reaction force for centripetal force because the force is just tension, while in non-inertial frame, centrifugal force is added to "balance" the centripetal force as stated by the Newton 3rd law; otherwise, the law will be invalidated.

Hope its correct this time

Thanks anyway
 
Zynoakib said:
you experience both the centripetal force (because you are rotating with the ball)
You may not experience. You just feel like something pull you out, which you stated it after this, a pseudo force. This experience is one of the key for Einstein to establish General Relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
Zynoakib said:
there is no reaction force for centripetal force because the force is just tension
Of course not, for tension is made by the molecules on the rope! It's a real force so it must have a reaction, which is the force from the rope.
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
tommyxu3 said:
Of course not, for tension is made by the molecules on the rope! It's a real force so it must have a reaction, which is the force from the rope.
so does that mean the reaction force for centripetal force is the force from the rope, and tension is kind of like a "medium" to provide centripetal force?
 
tommyxu3 said:
Of course not, for tension is made by the molecules on the rope! It's a real force so it must have a reaction, which is the force from the rope.

The tension is the centripetal force .
 
Qwertywerty said:
The tension is the centripetal force .
Yes, it is.
Zynoakib said:
so does that mean the reaction force for centripetal force is the force from the rope, and tension is kind of like a "medium" to provide centripetal force?
Yes. The rope makes the force, a centripetal force that the rope pulls you, so the reaction must be a force you pull the rope.
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib and Qwertywerty
Zynoakib said:
I am giving the ball an centripetal force to keep it moving in circular motion, so is the tension in the string the reaction force I am asking?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_centrifugal_force

Zynoakib said:
I also want to ask about the reason why centrifugal force is considered as a pseudo-force. ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force

Note that these two are different things (see table in the first link). The modern use of "centrifugal force" usually means the later (inertial force existing in rotating frames only).
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
  • #10
tommyxu3 said:
Yes. The rope makes the force, a centripetal force that the rope pulls you, so the reaction must be a force you pull the rope.

Yeah - that's correct .
 
  • #11
Thank you all guys I think I have had a better grasp of the concept!
 
Back
Top