What is the reasoning behind µ < 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack action
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The coefficient of friction (μ) can exceed 1, contrary to common misconceptions taught in educational systems. A notable instance occurred in a CIE A level exam where a coefficient of friction value of 1.27 was presented, highlighting the confusion caused by the myth that μ cannot exceed 1. This misunderstanding stems from outdated theories that incorrectly emphasized contact area and ignored phenomena like galling and adhesion. The discussion underscores the importance of accurate teaching in physics to prevent misconceptions among students.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly friction.
  • Familiarity with the coefficient of friction and its applications.
  • Knowledge of common misconceptions in educational settings.
  • Awareness of experimental methods in physics that measure friction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the factors that influence the coefficient of friction in various materials.
  • Explore advanced friction models that account for adhesion and surface roughness.
  • Study real-world applications where coefficients of friction exceed 1, such as in racing or industrial settings.
  • Investigate educational methodologies to improve the teaching of physics concepts related to friction.
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, students preparing for A level exams, engineers working with material properties, and anyone interested in the principles of friction and its real-world implications.

jack action
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
9,895
I know the coefficient of friction can be greater than one. But it seems that a lot of people were thought the opposite at some point through the school system. What was the reasoning behind that theory? I can't imagine how you could prove such a statement.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jack action said:
I know the coefficient of friction can be greater than one. But it seems that a lot of people were thought the opposite at some point through the school system. What was the reasoning behind that theory? I can't imagine how you could prove such a statement.

It's a terrible idea to tell students that the coefficient of friction is less than or equal to 1. It's rarely greater than 1, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I know a teacher who once told his students it can never exceed 1, and guess what, they ended up getting a question on their A level exam where the value of μ they were supposed to calculate was actually 1.27. Incidentally, this was the only year in which a coefficient of friction greater than 1 actually appeared on a CIE A level exam.
Anyway, you could imagine how terrible it was for students who obtained the correct answer but ended up erasing their work and wasting a lot of time, all because they were told a myth (or a misquoted fact) by their teacher.
 
jack action said:
What was the reasoning behind that theory?
Interesting question, and probably no really clear answer. It did include contact area, forbade galling and adhesion (which would have wiped out any basis for proposing the "unit" limit in the first place), and made some strange appeal to intuition based on 45 degree frictionless (of all things) wedges, and it's just as well I can't recall the particulars. It made for entertaining evenings in college, listening to adherents vs. drag racing fans.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
859
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K