What is the Relationship Between Evaporative Cooling and Gas Pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angelos K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Power
AI Thread Summary
Evaporative cooling involves extracting energy from water vapor to achieve cooling, with the cooling power related to the latent heat and gas pressure. The equation presented suggests a proportional relationship between the cooling rate and gas pressure, but the discussion highlights that it oversimplifies the complexities of real-world evaporation processes, which also depend on air flow and efficiency factors. The vapor pressure and relative humidity play crucial roles in determining evaporation rates, with lower humidity leading to increased evaporation. The gas pressure formula referenced is derived from the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, which assumes ideal gas behavior and neglects certain factors. Overall, the relationship between evaporative cooling and gas pressure is complex and requires careful consideration of multiple variables.
Angelos K
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I wish to understand evaporative cooling. Apparently the principle consists in pumping the vapour above a bath, hence extracting it's most energetic corpuscles and achieving cooling.

The aim is to derive the cooling power. My textbook states:

\frac{dQ}{dt} = L\frac{dn}{dt} \propto p

L being the latent heat per mol and p the gas pressure. I don't see why the proportionality holds. Sorry if I miss something simple, I'm battling a light cold ;-)

[From here on one can use the gas pressure formula

p = p_0 \exp(-\frac{L}{RT})

to demonstrate, how with linearly decreasing temperature the cooling rate decreases exponentially]

Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Evaporative cooling simply absorbs sensible heat in the air via the latent heat of evaporation of water. How much heat you absorb is the amount of water evaporated over a period of time (dn/dt) times the latent heat per unit of water (L). How much evaporation you get depends on the vapor pressure.

This equation you list has no information about air flow and the actual process of evaporation in it. Typically, you would get dn/dt directly from the absolute humidity of the air, but you also need to assume an efficiency factor in a real device (say, 75% for a decent cooling tower). You can easily diagram the process on a psychrometric chart.
 
Thanks! So my textbook seems to make several oversimplifying assumptions, right?

What I don't get is how he gets to the relation:

L\frac{dn}{dt} \propto p
 
I don't know if I'd say oversimplifying assumptions - the math to actually calculate evaporative cooling via convection is pretty daunting and not very accurate in the real world anyway. It is best found via experimentation, giving a simple efficiency factor.

I'm not quite sure what is going on with that gas pressure formula (is that in the book too?), but I would think it should be proportional to the difference in partial pressure vs saturation pressure: ie, the relative humidity. In other words, as the relative humidity goes down, the number of moles evaporated goes up.
 
Last edited:
The gas pressure formula [exponential increase with temperature] is derived in the book from the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, by neglecting the volume of the fluid phase compared to that of the gaseous one AND making an ideal gas assumption for the gas.

I suppose the ideal gas behaviour to be a really rough approximation, even for helium, since the temperatures reached are around 1K

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clausius-Clapeyron_relation" discusses the Clausius-Clapeyron equation and its less general form

\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{Lp}{R{T}^2}

used here]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top