What is the relationship between phase and path difference in waves?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kira506
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path Phase Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between phase and path difference in waves, particularly in the context of electromagnetic (EM) waves and optics. Participants explore the definitions of phase, phase difference, and how these concepts relate to wave interference and optical path length.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek clarification on the concept of phase in waves, questioning how the electric and magnetic fields in EM waves can be in phase while being time-varying and perpendicular.
  • Others explain that in optics, the electric field is typically used for simplicity, and that phase difference can be calculated using optical path length (OPL) and optical path difference (OPD).
  • One participant describes the mathematical representation of wave phase and how phase difference quantifies the time lag between waves, using examples of sine functions.
  • There is a discussion about how waves can interfere constructively or destructively depending on their phase relationship, with specific reference to phase differences of zero and pi radians.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether simultaneous occurrence of waves implies they remain in phase along their paths, suggesting that periodic time may differ while still being in phase at certain points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of phase and phase difference, but there are multiple competing views regarding the implications of these concepts in different contexts, particularly concerning the behavior of EM waves and their interference patterns. The discussion remains unresolved on certain aspects, such as the implications of simultaneous occurrence and varying periodic times.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of phase relationships in different contexts, dependence on definitions of phase and path length, and unresolved mathematical steps in calculating optical path differences.

kira506
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
What is meant by phase of a wave? I can't get a grasp of it especially after knowing that in an em wave ,the magnetic and electric fields E and B respectively are in phase , aren't they time varying and perpendicular to each other? Doesn't changing the inclination affect the phase ? Also,the phase difference ,I can't get it(this may sound stupid) when phase difference=0,does that mean that,say the 2 waves I'm measuring their phase diff. Are in phase ? And what are the possible equations by which I can determine the path difference between 2 waves? Thanks in avance !
 
Science news on Phys.org
For optics the electric field is usually chosen for simplicity; unless the light is in a waveguide there is a fixed relationship between the electric and magnetic fields.

Thus polarization is wrt the electric field; so is phase.

If two waves are in phase (phase difference is zero) then they constructively interfere; if they are out of phase by pi radians (180 degrees) they interfere destructively. And all other cases are intermediate.

In optics the phase difference can be calculated with the "optical path length", or OPL. So if you have two paths you calculate the OPL for each one, and their difference is the OPD="optical path difference". From the OPD you can determine the expected phase shift.

The OPL is the geometric distance x index of refraction; if these are varying along the way you chop up the path and apply the corresponding index of refraction.

They march through all of the theory and calculations for the Michelson interferometer here:
http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/undergraduate/phys2260/Lectures/Intro%20Optics%20-%20PPT%20v2part%2004.pdfAlso see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_path_length
 
Phase of a standard wave y= A*sin(wt+phi), where the same could be re written as y = A*sin(x). Now, as you know w- stands for angular frequency and t- time period , basically you find the entire term in the bracket speaks of angular displacement in physical sense, phi is the quamtity that distinguishes one wave from the other interms of time lag, when you say a wave y1 = A1*sin(w1t+phi) and another wave y2= A1*sin(w1t+phi+pi/2) , what we mean here is the second wave starts at a distance of pi/2 radians after the first wave this is just a physical sense of the entire wave concept. It speaks quantitavely of the lag between waves if there is one. It gives a complete picture because em waves have wide spectrum of different waves building it. In every day application you have low frequency waves, high frequency waves etc starting at different points in space time and buidling either constructively or destructively over the period of time. Therefore the only mathematical wave we can quantify the final wave and its amplitude is by acurately describing all parametrs like the amplitude of each wave, its angular frequency , time period and phase diff between the waves. I hope this answers your question. In EM waves both electric and magnetic fields are time varying which is true but they are in phas emeaning they occur at the same point in space time, on doesn't occur after the other they occur simultaneously.
 
UltrafastPED said:
For optics the electric field is usually chosen for simplicity; unless the light is in a waveguide there is a fixed relationship between the electric and magnetic fields.

Thus polarization is wrt the electric field; so is phase.

If two waves are in phase (phase difference is zero) then they constructively interfere; if they are out of phase by pi radians (180 degrees) they interfere destructively. And all other cases are intermediate.

In optics the phase difference can be calculated with the "optical path length", or OPL. So if you have two paths you calculate the OPL for each one, and their difference is the OPD="optical path difference". From the OPD you can determine the expected phase shift.

The OPL is the geometric distance x index of refraction; if these are varying along the way you chop up the path and apply the corresponding index of refraction.

They march through all of the theory and calculations for the Michelson interferometer here:
http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/undergraduate/phys2260/Lectures/Intro%20Optics%20-%20PPT%20v2part%2004.pdf


Also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_path_length

Thanks a lot , that really halped especially that I'm familiar with these terms , now I get the OPD and its relation to the phase of the wave
 
Thomas_Phy_Eng said:
Phase of a standard wave y= A*sin(wt+phi), where the same could be re written as y = A*sin(x). Now, as you know w- stands for angular frequency and t- time period , basically you find the entire term in the bracket speaks of angular displacement in physical sense, phi is the quamtity that distinguishes one wave from the other interms of time lag, when you say a wave y1 = A1*sin(w1t+phi) and another wave y2= A1*sin(w1t+phi+pi/2) , what we mean here is the second wave starts at a distance of pi/2 radians after the first wave this is just a physical sense of the entire wave concept. It speaks quantitavely of the lag between waves if there is one. It gives a complete picture because em waves have wide spectrum of different waves building it. In every day application you have low frequency waves, high frequency waves etc starting at different points in space time and buidling either constructively or destructively over the period of time. Therefore the only mathematical wave we can quantify the final wave and its amplitude is by acurately describing all parametrs like the amplitude of each wave, its angular frequency , time period and phase diff between the waves. I hope this answers your question. In EM waves both electric and magnetic fields are time varying which is true but they are in phas emeaning they occur at the same point in space time, on doesn't occur after the other they occur simultaneously.
So they occur simultaneously but the periodic time differs ? So by saying that they occur simultaneously , you mean that do occur at the same time and space but this may change along their path and they'd be still in phase ? (Sorry for the trouble , i understand stuff slowly and thanks btw for the aforementioned information )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
993
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
869
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K