What is the Resulting Velocity of Ball 3 in a 3-Body Elastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
In a three-body elastic collision involving three 1g balls, where Balls 1 and 2 approach each other at 20m/s and collide with Ball 3 at a 90° angle, the momentum of Ball 3 remains unchanged. The simultaneous equal and opposite impulses from Balls 1 and 2 result in Ball 3 continuing its trajectory at 10m/s, unaffected by the collision. Kinetic energy is conserved in the system, but the closing velocity does not allow for an increase in Ball 3's speed. The discussion emphasizes that the scenario holds true unless external factors like spinning are introduced. The setup can be experimentally validated using pucks on an air table.
austin.hornbac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This may be intuitively obvious to you and I'm just missing it.

Say you had 3 balls each with a mass of 1g. Each moving at velocity of 10m/s on a 2D Cartesian plane. Ball 1 & 2 are moving toward the origin from opposite sides, so they are approaching each other at 20m/s. Ball 3 moving from negative Y values to positive values (so Up) at 10m/s. The 3 balls collide simultaneously at the origin so that Balls 1 & 2 contact Ball 3 at a 90° angle. Balls 1 & 2 don't collide with each other but rather each side of Ball 3.

Similar to hitting the cue ball in pool directly in the middle of 2 side by side balls, the cue ball would keep trajectory and the angle between the other 2 would be 90°. Only in reverse.

What would be the speed of ball 3 after the collision? I don't know if it would remain the same or not. I tried combining balls 1 & 2 to use it in the 2D collision with 2 objects equations but I don't know if that works or if I did it right.

My goal with this long winded explanation is to figure out if theoretically since the kinetic energy would be conserved in the system and the closing velocity between 1&2 is 20m/s could ball 3's velocity ever be above 10m/s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that momentum also has to be conserved.
 
Thats just a fn or kinetic energy and mass. So I'm still not sure. Is the answer obvious that it couldn't possibly increase the velocity of ball 3 or ?
 
The momentum of balls 1 & 2 is exchanged - they reflect from ball 3.

The momentum of ball 3 is unchanged in your scenario: equal but opposite impulses occur simultaneously from balls 1 & 2. Thus ball 3 continues to roll along after the collision, as though nothing happened.

Of course this is all wrong if the balls are spinning, etc.

But you can reproduce this with pucks on an air table if your setup is just right.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top