What is the RMS of this current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yosimba2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Rms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the root mean square (RMS) of a piecewise current function defined over two intervals: 10t² from 0 to 1 second and 0 from 1 to 2 seconds. Participants explore the correct approach to integrating these functions and averaging their contributions over the total period of 2 seconds.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the RMS should be calculated by integrating the function 10t² from 0 to 1 second and the function 0 from 1 to 2 seconds, then averaging the results over the total period of 2 seconds.
  • Others argue that the RMS value must be divided by the total time period (2 seconds) after summing the results of the integrals, leading to a coefficient of 1/2 for the RMS calculation.
  • A later reply questions the logic of averaging two separate RMS values, suggesting that the RMS should be calculated based on the mean of the squares of the contributions over the entire period.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the treatment of the period and the implications of averaging the two functions, particularly in relation to how the time intervals affect the overall RMS calculation.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of visualizing the contributions of each function to the overall average by considering the areas under the graph.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct method for calculating the RMS. There are competing views on how to handle the integration and averaging of the piecewise functions, leading to ongoing confusion and debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions underlying the RMS calculation, particularly regarding the treatment of the time period and the contributions of each segment of the piecewise function.

yosimba2000
Messages
206
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


Find the average current. The problem and given solution are in Untitled.png.

Homework Equations


RMS = sqrt((1/T)(integral of x^2 dt from 0 to T))

The Attempt at a Solution


From time 0 to 1, the equation describing current is 10t^2.

From time 1 to 2, the equation describing current is 0.

So RMS = sqrt((1/T)integral(10t^2 dt from 0 to 1)) + sqrt((1/T)integral(0 dt from 1 to 2)), where I use T = 1 for both T's because the 10t^2 occurs over 1 second, and the 0 amps also occurs over 1 second.

But I get the wrong answer...

Where did the book answer get 1/2 for the coefficient?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 429
Physics news on Phys.org
yosimba2000 said:
So RMS = sqrt((1/T)integral(10t^2 dt from 0 to 1)) + sqrt((1/T)integral(0 dt from 1 to 2)), where I use T = 1 for both T's because the 10t^2 occurs over 1 second, and the 0 amps also occurs over 1 second.
The first integral gives a result, say X. The second integral gives the result 0.

Adding these results gives X+0 = X, but you have integrated (totally) from 0 to 2, so to find the RMS-value ( root-mean-square ), you must divide by T, where T= 2-0 = 2.
Hence RMS = 1/2 * X.

The mean value is found by dividing by the time for a period, which here is 2s.
 
Last edited:
Hesch said:
The first integral gives a result, say X. The second integral gives the result 0.

Adding these results gives X+0 = X, but you have integrated (totally) from 0 to 2, so to find the RMS-value ( root-mean-square ), you must divide by T, where T= 2-0 = 2.
Hence RMS = 1/2 * X.

So if I understand this correctly, I first found the RMS of function 10t^2 from 0-1 seconds, then the RMS of function 0 amps from 1-2.

And then finally I average both RMS values? So it's kind of like averaging the averages (RMS's)?
 
To calculate the average over the whole period you should be dividing by the full period. It makes no difference whether you first sum the results of both integrations then divide by 2T, or whether you divide individual integrals by 2T before summing them, but the dividend needs to be 2T.

Suppose the signal2 was 8 for 0<t<1 and 0 for 1<t<2, you wouldn't claim its average over the whole 2 secs to still be 8, but that's the answer your maths would be giving.

You have a second mistake. The sqrt must be performed as the last operation, on the mean of the squares.
 
#3: I would formulate it: . . . . .

Well, let NascentOxygen explain.

His english is better than my english.
 
Ok, I was confused because I saw that the period was 2 seconds, and I'm used to seeing a period used for one continuous function, not multiple.

As in, if you were treat the curve from 0-2 seconds as 10t^2, you would see it clearly cannot be since 10t^2 won't make that horizontal line. So the curve must be made of two separate functions.

So I thought the book was saying the period of 2 seconds is described by the function 10t^2 alone, hence me questioning the 1/2 when clearly 10t^2 is only over a period of 1 second, and the 0 amps over the next 1 second.

*edit*

Wait I can't average the two RMS's?
 
yosimba2000 said:
So if I understand this correctly, I first found the RMS of function 10t^2 from 0-1 seconds, then the RMS of function 0 amps from 1-2.
That is what you did, and that's wrong.

And then finally I average both RMS values? So it's kind of like averaging the averages (RMS's)?
That is what you did, and that also is wrong.

I explained it in words earlier, but here is how you can write it using maths:

RMS = sqrt ( mean of ( sum of squares )))
 
Hmm ok it still doesn't make sense to me.

Why do I divide by 2 for period when the 10t^2 is only over 1 second? Likewise with the 0 amps?

I guess I could follow the formula, but I'd like to know the intuition behind it.

Like if I were doing this on the number of rats or something, the period would be switched with the number of samples I have.

Here, isn't my sample 1 second? If I use 2, that implies the 10t^2 function is applied over 2 seconds... but it's only 1 second
 
We are interested in knowing the contribution made to the whole period by each signal.

10t^2 existing for 1 sec contributes how much to our 2 sec average? It is best visualised by considering areas under the graph: how high will the rectangle be once you level out the components to show the average?
 
  • #10
Ah ok gotcha,

I started thinking of it in terms of animal samples and it made more sense.

Thanks everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K