What is the role of speed and acceleration in delivering an effective punch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Surgikill117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of delivering an effective punch, emphasizing that speed and acceleration of the fist are less critical than the overall body mechanics involved. The original poster attempted to measure their punching speed and force using an accelerometer app, but received feedback on potential inaccuracies and the need for proper calculations, including taking square roots in kinematic equations. It was noted that effective striking relies on maximizing reaction forces transmitted through the ground and maintaining efficient load paths in the body. Additionally, the importance of force duration in delivering impactful strikes was highlighted, with examples such as the "one inch punch" demonstrating that body mechanics can compensate for less fist acceleration. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the physics behind effective punching techniques.
Surgikill117
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey guys I am a high school senior and this is my first year taking physics. I am really interested in the subject and like to find out real world problems for fun. One of the things I am trying to do is find my punching speed. I downloaded an acceleration app for my phone that displays the amount of felt g's using the accelerometer. I then tried to change this into m/s^2 and find out the speed of my punch and the force being exerted upon it. It came out to be around 110 m/s and about 748 N of force. I don't think that this is correct so I was wondering what I am doing wrong? Is my phone not accurate (more than likely) or do I need a different equation other than average acceleration and f=ma? If you want the equations I am using just ask and I will upload some photos.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,

How many "g's" did the phone say it felt? If you assume constant acceleration, you can figure out how fast your fist should be moving at the end of the displacement using the kinematics equations. You know a, you know d, you assume vi = 0, and then you can find vf.
 
It said that it experienced 8.5 g's. I assumed that vi was 0 and that my arm travels about 26 inches. I converted everything into m and calculated it and got 110 m/s as vf. Then did f=ma and got 74 n or ~168 ft. lbs of force.

Oh and I said that my arm was about 15 lbs or 6.8 kg, which is about right.
 
Well, for one thing you decelerate over a much smaller time interval and distance interval than you accelerate. So the sudden stop when your arm reaches full extension is going to cause the phone to feel a huge acceleration.

Secondly, you forgot to take a square root:

$$v_f^2 = 2ad$$

2*a*d = 110 m2/s2

You need to take the square root to get the final speed. 36 km/h sounds plausible I guess. So maybe I was wrong about the deceleration. Maybe the phone doesn't measure that, or it takes an average, or something.
 
Well I am trying to figure the speed at which somebody would be hit, so I am thinking that the deceleration from my arm would be almost equal to if not less than from hitting a person. I am kind of missing you on the square root thing, do you mean I need to take the square root of 2ad? Because vf is squared?
 
Surgikill117 said:
Well I am trying to figure the speed at which somebody would be hit, so I am thinking that the deceleration from my arm would be almost equal to if not less than from hitting a person. I am kind of missing you on the square root thing, do you mean I need to take the square root of 2ad? Because vf is squared?

Yeah, of course.
 
The impulse delivered in a punch has very little to do with the speed or acceleration of the fist, and much more to do with what the puncher does with the rest of his/her body. A trained person can do much more damage with an elbow strike than with a punch, yet the speed and acceleration of the elbow is far less than he can achieve with his fist. Why is that?

You can think of this in terms of impulse, energy, or momentum. Any way you look at it, you have to apply a force for a period of time or over a distance of travel. Any force imparted has to be transmitted to an equal and opposite force reacted by the ground. Nearly all the training to deliver an effective strike is aimed at maximizing the reaction force transmitted to the ground.

To get to the ground, the force has to follow an efficient load path, or it will be absorbed by your body, which is the connection between the force delivered to the victim and the reaction to the ground. So you learn how to shape that load path to keep it as short and as simple as possible, and how to make it pass through the strongest parts of your body.

The other important thing is delivering an effective strike is to maximize duration of force. That is why in Jujitsu I was always train to never deliver a strike to a person’s face. Aim for the back of the head. The face is just in the way. Punch through the face and head.

Nothing can demonstrate this better than the “one inch punch” made famous by Bruce Lee. It is possible to deliver nearly full punching power with only one inch of fist acceleration distance if you do everything correctly in the rest of your body. This was never meant to be a credible fighting technique, but rather a training method to remove the speed and acceleration of the fist from the equation all together and focusing on training the rest of the body to effectively develop the reaction force to the ground.

So if you want to understand the physics of delivering an effective punch, learn how to draw a free body diagram and understand the load paths through your body. Speed and acceleration are important, but more so for what the rest of your body is doing than for your fist.
 
Pkruse said:
The impulse delivered in a punch has very little to do with the speed or acceleration of the fist, and much more to do with what the puncher does with the rest of his/her body. A trained person can do much more damage with an elbow strike than with a punch, yet the speed and acceleration of the elbow is far less than he can achieve with his fist. Why is that?

You can think of this in terms of impulse, energy, or momentum. Any way you look at it, you have to apply a force for a period of time or over a distance of travel. Any force imparted has to be transmitted to an equal and opposite force reacted by the ground. Nearly all the training to deliver an effective strike is aimed at maximizing the reaction force transmitted to the ground.

To get to the ground, the force has to follow an efficient load path, or it will be absorbed by your body, which is the connection between the force delivered to the victim and the reaction to the ground. So you learn how to shape that load path to keep it as short and as simple as possible, and how to make it pass through the strongest parts of your body.

The other important thing is delivering an effective strike is to maximize duration of force. That is why in Jujitsu I was always train to never deliver a strike to a person’s face. Aim for the back of the head. The face is just in the way. Punch through the face and head.

Nothing can demonstrate this better than the “one inch punch” made famous by Bruce Lee. It is possible to deliver nearly full punching power with only one inch of fist acceleration distance if you do everything correctly in the rest of your body. This was never meant to be a credible fighting technique, but rather a training method to remove the speed and acceleration of the fist from the equation all together and focusing on training the rest of the body to effectively develop the reaction force to the ground.

So if you want to understand the physics of delivering an effective punch, learn how to draw a free body diagram and understand the load paths through your body. Speed and acceleration are important, but more so for what the rest of your body is doing than for your fist.

I completely understand what you are saying, I am a black belt in karate, I just wanted to do this for its and giggles. See if the accelerometer measurement was any accurate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K