What is the significance of 54 volts in the Davidson Germer Experiment?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikhil Rajagopalan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The significance of 54 volts in the Davisson-Germer experiment is that it corresponds to the accelerating voltage at which a pronounced diffraction pattern is observed, specifically at a scattering angle of 50 degrees. At this voltage, the electrons' momenta and de Broglie wavelength align to produce the first maximum in the intensity diagram. Deviating from 54 volts, either lower or higher, results in a displacement of the first maximum and alters the intensity pattern. This phenomenon is further explained by the electrons' index of refraction, which affects their behavior as they exit the crystal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of de Broglie wavelength and its relation to electron momentum.
  • Familiarity with diffraction patterns and their significance in physics.
  • Knowledge of the Bragg equation and its application in scattering experiments.
  • Basic concepts of electron behavior in crystalline structures.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electron diffraction and its applications in material science.
  • Study the Bragg equation and its limitations in electron scattering experiments.
  • Explore the concept of index of refraction for electrons in crystalline materials.
  • Examine the historical context and advancements in the Davisson-Germer experiment.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying quantum mechanics or solid-state physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in electron diffraction and its implications in experimental physics.

Nikhil Rajagopalan
Messages
72
Reaction score
5
In the experiment, a pronounced diffraction pattern is observed at an accelerating voltage of 54 volts. Beyond and below 54 volts, the peaks are not pronounced. What is the significance of 54 volts ? Why does the peak become less high below and above the specific value of accelerating voltage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a source for this claim? Of course the voltage determines the electrons' momenta and thus their de Broglie wavelength. At a scattering angle determined by this wavelength you get the first maximum.

For a first explanation, see Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davisson–Germer_experiment
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikhil Rajagopalan
The given scattering angle is 50 degrees and the selected accelerating voltage is 54 volts. If we are looking for the first maximum at a range exactly around 50 degrees of scattering angle, from the calculation, the accelerating voltage should be 54 volts. And beyond and below 54 volts, the first maximum may be displaced and the intensity diagram around 50 degrees of scattering angle will change. In that case, at a different accelerating voltage other than 54 volts, say 50 volts or 60 volts, there will still be a primary maxima observable but at a different angle of diffraction. Other than that, is there any other specific reason to choose 50 degrees and 54 volts as angle of scattering and accelerating potential respectively?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
In the Wikipedia article, you should note that their original experiment did not agree with the Bragg equation. That is the measured peak did not occur at the angle which the Bragg equation predicted. The reason was that they failed to realize that the electrons have an index of refraction and are additionally redirected as they exit the crystal.

The following quote is taken from the paper of their continuing experiments.

FROM: REFLECTION OF ELECTRONS BY A CRYSTAL OF NICKEL
By C. J. DAVISSON AND L. H. Germer
BELL Telephone Laboratories Inc., New York City
Communicated March 10, 1928

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/14/4/317.full.pdf

"These results, including the failure of the data to satisfy the Bragg formula, are in accord with those previously obtained in our experiments on electron diffraction. The reflection data fail to satisfy the Bragg relation for the same reason that the electron diffraction beams fail to coincide with their Laue beam analogues. These differences between the electron and x-ray phenomena can perhaps be accounted for by assuming, as first suggested by Eckart,' that the crystal is characterized by an index of refraction for electrons as it is for x-rays, and that for electrons of the speeds used in our experiments the index has values which are quite different from unity.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: davenn and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
576
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K