What is the significance of Bessel function quotients?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of Bessel function quotients, specifically Kn'(x)/Kn(x) and In'(x)/In(x), as x approaches zero. Participants detail the behavior of these quotients, revealing that for n > 0, both quotients tend to infinity, while for n = 0, In'/In tends to 0 and Kn'/Kn tends to infinity with a negative sign. The squeezing technique is suggested for bounding these quotients, and the significance of Landau's symbol O(x) is clarified as it relates to orders of magnitude in the context of Bessel functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds (In(x) and Kn(x))
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically derivatives and limits
  • Knowledge of asymptotic analysis and Landau's notation (O(x))
  • Basic concepts of series expansions in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds
  • Study the squeezing theorem and its applications in mathematical analysis
  • Explore asymptotic expansions and their relevance in evaluating limits
  • Learn more about Landau's symbols and their use in describing function behavior
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, applied mathematicians, and students studying advanced calculus or mathematical analysis, particularly those focusing on special functions and asymptotic behavior.

rj_brown
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!

I'm having to complete a piece of work for which I have to consider Bessel function quotients. By that I mean:

Kn'(x)/Kn(x) and In'(x)/In(x)

By Kn(x) I mean a modified Bessel function of the second kind of order n and by Kn'(x) I mean the derivative of Kn(x) with respect to the argument x.

Simurlaly, In(x) is a modified Bessel function of the first kind of order n and In'(x) is its derivative.

Basically what I need to find is Kn'(x)/Kn(x) and In'(x)/In(x) for x tending to zero, this obviously gives rise to a lot of "infinity/infinity" and "0/0" situations, so I need to perform some analysis on these.

My supervisor has suggested using a squeezing technique, which I think would work but would require upper and lower bounds of the quotients.

I know it's a bit of an involved question, but does anyone have any advice (I'm killing myself with this one!).

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Case n>0 :
I[n,x] = ((x/2)^n)(1+O(x))
I'[n,x] = (n/2)((x/2)^(n-1))(1+O(x))
I'/I = (n/(2x))(1+O(x))
x -> 0 then I'/I tends to infinity with sign of x
Case n=0 :
I[0,x] = 1+(x/2)²+O(x^4)
I'[0,x] = (x/2)+O(x^3)
I'/I = (x/2)+O(x^3)
x -> 0 then I'/I tends to 0

Case n>0 :
K[n,x) = (1/2)((n-1)!)((2/x)^n)(1+O(x))
k'[n,x] = (1/2)((n-1)!)((2/x)^n)(-1/x)(1+O(x))
K'/K = (-n/x)(1+O(x))
x -> 0 tnen K'/K tends to infinity with sign of (-x)
Case n=0 :
K[0,x] = ln(2/x) -g +O(x²ln(x))
g = Euler's constant
K'[0,x] = -1/x +O(x ln(x))
K'/K = (-1/x +O(x ln(x)))/(ln(x)+O(1))/
K'/K = -1/(x ln(x)) +O(x ln(x))
x -> 0 then K'/K tends to infinity with sign of (-x)

In all the above, ln(x) means ln(abs(x))
 
JJacquelin said:
Case n>0 :
I[n,x] = ((x/2)^n)(1+O(x))
I'[n,x] = (n/2)((x/2)^(n-1))(1+O(x))
I'/I = (n/(2x))(1+O(x))
x -> 0 then I'/I tends to infinity with sign of x
Case n=0 :
I[0,x] = 1+(x/2)²+O(x^4)
I'[0,x] = (x/2)+O(x^3)
I'/I = (x/2)+O(x^3)
x -> 0 then I'/I tends to 0

Case n>0 :
K[n,x) = (1/2)((n-1)!)((2/x)^n)(1+O(x))
k'[n,x] = (1/2)((n-1)!)((2/x)^n)(-1/x)(1+O(x))
K'/K = (-n/x)(1+O(x))
x -> 0 tnen K'/K tends to infinity with sign of (-x)
Case n=0 :
K[0,x] = ln(2/x) -g +O(x²ln(x))
g = Euler's constant
K'[0,x] = -1/x +O(x ln(x))
K'/K = (-1/x +O(x ln(x)))/(ln(x)+O(1))/
K'/K = -1/(x ln(x)) +O(x ln(x))
x -> 0 then K'/K tends to infinity with sign of (-x)

In all the above, ln(x) means ln(abs(x))

Hey thanks for that I really appreciate it! Could you just explain your initial form of K[x,n] and I[x,n] as its not something I'm familiar with. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
rj_brown said:
Hey thanks for that I really appreciate it! Could you just explain your initial form of K[x,n] and I[x,n] as its not something I'm familiar with. Thanks.

What I wrote is the first terms of the series expansion of the Bessel functions.
In order to solve a problem related to Bessel functions, of course, some properties of these functions are supposed to be known.
If you don't known these formulas, you have to use another method related to what you are supposed to know about the basic properties of those functions. This wasn't stated in your first post.
 
JJacquelin said:
What I wrote is the first terms of the series expansion of the Bessel functions.
In order to solve a problem related to Bessel functions, of course, some properties of these functions are supposed to be known.
If you don't known these formulas, you have to use another method related to what you are supposed to know about the basic properties of those functions. This wasn't stated in your first post.

Sorry I'm an applied mathematician not a Bessel expert. My main sticking point is just what O(x) means, the only place I've seen this before is in discussing orders of magnitude.
 
rj_brown said:
Sorry I'm an applied mathematician not a Bessel expert. My main sticking point is just what O(x) means, the only place I've seen this before is in discussing orders of magnitude.

Hello!
O(x) is the Landau's symbol. Yes, it is a matter of order of magnituide. Roughly, f(x)=1+O(x) means that f(x) tends to 1 and O(x) tends to 0 while x tends to 0.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LandauSymbols.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BesselFunctionoftheFirstKind.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BesselFunctionoftheSecondKind.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K