What is the significance of the green line in the graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a graph representing the electric field in relation to electric potential, specifically focusing on the significance of a green line that indicates the negative gradient of potential. Participants are tasked with graphing the x component of the electric field based on the provided potential data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the continuity of the graph and whether to represent certain points with dots or holes. Questions arise regarding the classification of specific points as cusps and the implications of discontinuities in the derivative of potential.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on how to represent the graph accurately. There is a focus on the characteristics of piecewise functions and the appropriate graphical representation of discontinuities.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the graph's continuity and the representation of sharp transitions in the electric field, as well as the requirements of the homework assignment regarding the graphing of piecewise functions.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

An electric field in a region of space is parallel to the x axis. The electric potential varies with position as shown in Figure P25.36. Graph the x component of the electric field versus position in this region of space.[PLAIN]http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/2959/81320259.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



[PLAIN]http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/3752/13833299.jpg

The green is the -grad V or just -dV/dx, at x = 2 to 3, I am just wondering, that is 0, but should I put a dot on the origin?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost certainly. A graph like this should be continuous throughout (as long as you have all the data necessary to supply the points).

You may also want to consider how other people draw "square waves". Here is an example:

http://www.fourieroptics.org.uk/orgsq.png
 
It's a piecewise function...?
 
Ah ok, I see that the last part of my post wasn't concise.

I was trying to push you towards a way in which you may wish to draw your graph of E so that it would be more acceptable.

But yes you are correct, both the figure P25.36 and the one you have been asked to draw are piecewise functions.
 
Actually I just realize something, should I draw holes at the cusps?
 
flyingpig said:
Actually I just realize something, should I draw holes at the cusps?
You definitely should!
 
SammyS said:
You definitely should!

At x= 2 and 3, are those classified as cusps too? They look sharp...
 
flyingpig said:
At x= 2 and 3, are those classified as cusps too? They look sharp...
Yes. dV/dx is discontinuous at those points.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
35K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K