What Is the Sled's Speed When Released from a Compressed Spring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a sled propelled by a compressed spring at a waterpark. The problem focuses on calculating the sled's speed at two different points of spring compression, utilizing concepts from energy conservation and spring mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between spring compression and the sled's speed, questioning the application of energy conservation principles. They discuss the differences in energy release at varying compression distances and the correct setup for energy equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting to clarify misconceptions regarding energy calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct formulation of energy differences, and there is an ongoing exploration of the implications of significant figures in calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding spring force and energy conservation, particularly in the context of varying compression distances. Participants are also addressing the importance of maintaining significant figures throughout their calculations.

Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


At a waterpark, sleds with riders are sent along a slippery, horizontal surface by the release of a large, compressed spring. The spring with a force constant k = 4300 N/m and negligible mass rests on the frictionless horizontal surface. One end is in contact with a stationary wall. A sled and rider with total mass 68.0 kg are pushed against the other end, compressing the spring 0.390 m . The sled is then released with zero initial velocity.

1.)What is the sled's speed when the spring returns to its uncompressed length?

2.)What is the sled's speed when the spring is still compressed 0.225 m ?

Homework Equations


Work done by a spring = 1/2*K*X^2

Work = change in Kinetic Energy

The Attempt at a Solution



1.) 1/2*K*X^2=K2 - K1 ------> K1=0

1/2*K*X^2=1/2*M*V2^2

V2= sqrt (K*X^2)/M = sqrt (4300*(0.39^2))/68 = 3.1 m/s

2.) I tried the same thing from the part before but instead i chose X=0.165m since that's the distance that the spring moves from the initial position when the spring is compressed 0.39m. I got 1.31 m/s which was wrong and I don't know why
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elvis 123456789 said:
instead i chose X=0.165m since that's the distance that the spring moves from the initial position
That does not work. The force decreases as the spring expands, so there is relatively more energy released in the first part than in the second.
Instead, just consider the total energy at the 0.225m of compression point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Student100
`
haruspex said:
That does not work. The force decreases as the spring expands, so there is relatively more energy released in the first part than in the second.
Instead, just consider the total energy at the 0.225m of compression point.
So then could I setup the problem as follows

1/2*K*X^2=1/2*M*V2^2 - 1/2*M*V1^2 ----> V1 = sqrt (M*V2^2 - K*X^2)/M

using V2 = 3.1 m/s
X = 0.2 m

V1= 2.66 m/s

is this correct?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
`

So then could I setup the problem as follows

1/2*K*X^2=1/2*M*V2^2 - 1/2*M*V1^2 ----> V1 = sqrt (M*V2^2 - K*X^2)/M

using V2 = 3.1 m/s
X = 0.2 m

V1= 2.66 m/s

is this correct?
That's the right idea, but a little inaccurate. You are given data to three significant figures. Keep 4 sig figures through all your working, and write the final answers to three.

Edit: just noticed you wrote x=.2 in your last post. The given value was .225.
 
haruspex said:
That's the right idea, but a little inaccurate. You are given data to three significant figures. Keep 4 sig figures through all your working, and write the final answers to three.

Edit: just noticed you wrote x=.2 in your last post. The given value was .225.
oh yah, i mixed up the 0.2 for another problem I was looking at, i meant 0.255.

Do you think you can clarify a little bit more on why what i did the first time was wrong. Like why did it work for the first part and not the second.
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
oh yah, i mixed up the 0.2 for another problem I was looking at, i meant 0.255.

Do you think you can clarify a little bit more on why what i did the first time was wrong. Like why did it work for the first part and not the second.
Consider two different extension of a spring, x and y. In your first approach you took the difference in energies as ##\frac 12k(y-x)^2##. But the energy difference is clearly ##\frac 12k(y^2-x^2)##. Are they the same?
 
haruspex said:
Consider two different extension of a spring, x and y. In your first approach you took the difference in energies as ##\frac 12k(y-x)^2##. But the energy difference is clearly ##\frac 12k(y^2-x^2)##. Are they the same?
oh ok I see. So whenever I am to obtain the distance traveled by the spring, I take the difference of the squares with respect to the initial position?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
oh ok I see. So whenever I am to obtain the distance traveled by the spring, I take the difference of the squares with respect to the initial position?
For energy, yes. Not for difference in force, obviously.
 
haruspex said:
For energy, yes. Not for difference in force, obviously.
ok I see. Thanks for the help haruspex!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K