What is the Solution for Dynamics with Bounces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elitewarr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving a ball that bounces on steps, with specific focus on the vertical and horizontal components of motion, as well as the coefficient of restitution (e). The original poster attempts to determine the value of e while considering the ball's motion and the distances involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the distances the ball falls and bounces, questioning the rationale behind the specified distances. There are discussions about using vertical motion equations and the implications of different assumptions regarding bounce heights.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using the vertical component of motion to find e, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made regarding the distances involved in the bounces. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the initial conditions necessary for a unique solution, indicating that multiple interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the assumptions regarding the height of the bounce and the corresponding fall distance, which affects the calculation of e. The original poster's method and the provided information from the problem statement are also under scrutiny.

elitewarr
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/8532/phyf.jpg
It is observed that the ball always bounces exactly once on each step.

Homework Equations


s = ut + 1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[PLAIN]http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/6678/abccz.jpg
So after resolving, horizontal velocity must be always constant as it bounces exactly once on each step and must be 0.30/t ms^-1
So, u*cos(theta) = v*cos(phi) = 0.30(1/t)
And to find e, we form the equation e*u*sin(theta) = -v*sin(phi)
I also find time t, for which the ball moves -0.20m vertically and 0.30m horizontally. Upwards as positive. Using s = ut + 1/2at^2
-0.20 = v*sin(phi)*t + 1/2(-9.81)(t^2)
But I tried manipulating around and I just can't find e.

Is something wrong with my method? Do I need to use momentum to calculate this question?
Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Just consider the vertical component of the motion to find the value of e.
The ball falls a distance 0.4m and bounces up a distance 0.2. That's a ratio of 2 to1.
The value of e given, 0.71, is the square root of 1/2. This should provide a big clue.
Use v2=u2+2gs for the fall and the bounce, with the values of s I mentioned, to find the ratio of the squares of the velocities.
 
Last edited:


But why will the ball fall a distance 0.4m? What's the rationale behind it?
 


It's what's (apparently) given in the question. In the diagram the ball bounces up to be level with the top of the previous step. It then falls down a height of 2 steps. Then it's motion down the steps is identical all the way down. I assume, in other words, that the diagram is giving this information.
 
Last edited:


Okay... Thanks anyway :D
 


As a bit of further information here. I've had a closer look at this question just to see if there is something deeper going on that I've missed.
There is no unique solution to the question if you don't assume the ball bounces up 0.2m and then falls down 0.4m.
You have to assume some initial height of bounce.
For example, you could solve the problem for a bounce up height of 0.1m and fall down of 0.3m. This would give you the same effect of bouncing down the steps, albeit with a flatter trajectory, and would mean (if you do the maths) that e=0.58 and the horizontal component of velocity =0.77m/s
In other words, there are an infinite number of solutions with different values of e and the horizontal component unless you assume the bounce up to be 0.2m
This then gives the values required in the question.
There's no other way of doing it with the information supplied.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K