What is the solution to Problem of the Week #172?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Problem of the Week #172 involves redistributing objects from $n$ boxes into $n+1$ new boxes, ensuring no new box is empty. The challenge is to prove that at least two objects will be placed in new boxes that contain fewer objects than their original boxes. This problem highlights the principles of combinatorial reasoning and the pigeonhole principle in mathematics. No solutions were provided in the forum discussion, indicating the complexity of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial principles
  • Familiarity with the pigeonhole principle
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs
  • Experience with problem-solving in discrete mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the pigeonhole principle in depth
  • Explore combinatorial proof techniques
  • Practice with similar problems in discrete mathematics
  • Review mathematical induction as a proof strategy
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of discrete mathematics, and anyone interested in combinatorial problem-solving will benefit from this discussion.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

A number of different objects has been distributed into $n$ boxes $B_{1}, B_{2}, \dots ,B_{n}.$ All the objects from these boxes are removed and redistributed into $n+1$ new boxes $B_{1}^{*}, B_{2}^{*}, \dots , B_{n+1}^{*},$ with no new box empty (so the total number of objects must be at least $n+1$). Prove that there are two objects each of which has the property that it is in a new box that contains fewer objects than the old box that contained it.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one solved this week's POTW. Here is a solution I found online:

Represent the situation as a bipartite graph where one color class are the $B_{i}$'s; the others are the $B^*_{j}$'s - hereafter referred to as the $A_{j}$'s. We can do this by letting each edge connecting $B_{i}$ to $A_{j}$ represent an object that is moved from $B_{i}$ to $A_{j}$.

Now fix $n$ and induct on the total number of edges $k$. Note $k >= n + 1$. Induct on $k$.

Base: If $k=n+1$, exactly one of the $B_{i}$'s has degree two; the rest have degree $1$. Said $B_{i}$ must be adjacent to an $A_{m}$ and an $A_{j}$ each with degree one. Those edges are the objects you want.

Induction: Suppose it holds for $k - 1$ and look at a situation with $k$ edges. Now if the graph is such that there exists two adjacent vertices each with degree $> 1$, remove the edge connecting them. The new graph satisfies the situation of the problem and the induction hypothesis. If not, then it must be that every edge touches a vertex with degree $1$. Say there are $a$ degree one $B$'s adjacent to degree one $A$'s, $b$ degree one $B$'s adjacent to non-degree one $A$'s, and $c$ non-degree one $B$'s adjacent to degree one $A$'s. Then $n = a + b + c$. If $c > 0$ we are done, as we can pick one of the $B$'s of this class and two of the edges connected to that $B$. If $c = 0$ then the total number of $B$'s is $n = a + b$ and the total number of edges is $k = a + b$. Since $k >= n + 1$ this is impossible. So $c > 0$ and we're done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K