What is the Solution to the Equipotential Surface Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of equipotential surfaces in the context of two charges located at rest. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the problem statement and the nature of the equipotential surface that is to be determined.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of equipotential surfaces and their characteristics, questioning how these surfaces relate to the given charges. There are inquiries about the implications of having only two points and how they can define an entire surface.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of equipotential surfaces and attempting to clarify the original poster's confusion. Some participants suggest that the problem may not be as trivial as it seems, while others emphasize the importance of understanding the potential at specific points.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the relationship between the charges and the equipotential surface, as well as the implications of having limited points to define the surface. Participants are also discussing the definitions and interpretations of lines and curves in mathematical contexts.

  • #31
It might help if you use the definition of the electric potential at a point:
"The work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to that point".
What path or paths (if you choose to use a plane instead of a straight line) , in this case,
would the test charge need to travel so that no work is done in moving the test charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I think I have understood this question properly that's why I want to show my understanding here

Each equipotential surface is a surface in 3D space, which corresponds to a line on the 2D graph where line can be curved or straight(That we will have to figure out).All the points on it will have same potential .With the two points given,I found out that same potential is zero then I had to find out the points of the equipotenial surface.##\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\bigg(\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y-1)^2}}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y-2)^2}}\bigg)##=PThis is the equation for an arbitrary equipotential surface - If we put in the value of P, we will get the equipotential surface whose value of potential on it is equal to P

By solving that I got ##y##=##1.5##

in a 3D Cartesian coordinates it is a collection of all points (x,1.5,z) where the values of x and z are arbitrary, any possible values from −∞ to +∞.

Hence in this case the equipotential will be represented by straight line
es-png.92380.png
 
  • #33
gracy said:
By solving that I got ##y=1.5##
By solving that for P = 0
in a 3D Cartesian coordinates it is a collection of all points (x,1.5,z) where the values of x and z are arbitrary, any possible values from −∞ to +∞. Hence in this case the equipotential will be represented by straight line
The intersection of this equipotential plane with the plane z = 0 is a straight line parallel to the x-axis

:smile: In short: your understanding is OK !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K