What Is the Speed of an Ice Flake in a Frictionless Hemispherical Bowl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mb85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of an ice flake in a frictionless hemispherical bowl, specifically focusing on its speed at the bottom of the bowl under various conditions. The subject area includes concepts of energy conservation, gravitational potential energy, and kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply energy conservation principles to determine the speed of the ice flake at the bottom of the bowl, questioning the impact of initial conditions on the outcome. Some participants suggest incorporating initial kinetic energy into the calculations for different scenarios.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the energy conservation equations. There is an ongoing examination of how initial speeds and mass affect the final speed of the ice flake, with some guidance provided on incorporating initial kinetic energy into the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the bowl is frictionless and are discussing the implications of varying initial conditions, such as mass and initial speed, on the motion of the ice flake.

mb85
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
In Fig. 8-30, a 4.5 g ice flake is released from the edge of a hemispherical bowl whose radius r is 28 cm. The flake-bowl contact is frictionless. (a) What is the speed of the flake when it reaches the bottom of the bowl? (b) If we substituted a second flake with 4 times the mass, what would its speed be? (c) If, instead, we gave the flake an initial downward speed 1.4 m/s along the bowl, what would the answer be?

I know for part a.
mgh = 1/2mv^2
v = Sqaure root (2gh)
v = 2.34 m/s

part b i know is the same answer as a, because the mass does not effect the speed.

but for part c, i am not getting the right answer and it seems like a relatively basic step. can someone help me out? :blushing:


Also, this problem is giving me headaches.
Figure 8-34 shows a pendulum of length L = 1.4 m. Its bob (which effectively has all the mass) has speed v0 when the cord makes an angle 0 = 48° with the vertical. (a) What is the speed of the bob when it is in its lowest position if v0 = 9.9 m/s? What is the least value that v0 can have if the pendulum is to swing down and then up (b) to a horizontal position, and (c) to a vertical position with the cord remaining straight?
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1062/art/qb/qu/c08/Fig08_34.gif

i was trying to find the y-component.
by doing cos48 = y/1.4
y = .94m

then sin 48 = x/1.4
x = 1.04m

1.4 - .94 = 0.46m
then i used v = Square root ((2)(9.8)(.46)
v = 9.016m/s
But then where do i use the initial velocity @?

im just a bit confused. thanks for ur help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For your problem, you need to factor in the intial kinetic energy to you equation.
 
mgh = 1/2m(v^2 - 1.4m/s^2) sonce it had that initial Kinetic energy before starting to slide. That it, ystem gains that much more Kinetic energy than a.

For the second question, you know the intitial Kinetic energy. Now the potential energy goes on changing and thus the Kinetic energy changes. To start the chane in potential energy for a is mg(1-cos(theta)).
Do the rest using the samee concept.
 
mb85 said:
(c) If, instead, we gave the flake an initial downward speed 1.4 m/s along the bowl, what would the answer be?

mgh = 1/2m(2.34m/s^2 - 1.4m/s^2)
mgh = 7.9101

??
 
mb85 said:
mgh = 1/2m(2.34m/s^2 - 1.4m/s^2)
mgh = 7.9101

??

Think of it this way...
We have no friction so there is no nonconservative work done in the system. Thus:
0= \Delta PE + \Delta KE
Choose the bottom of the bowl as your 0 for GPE. Thus the original height of the ice flake is at h. The final point is when the flake is at zero height.
0=(0-mgh)+(1/2)m(v^2-v_0^2)
or, as vaishakh said:
mgh=(1/2)m(v^2-v_0^2).

At this point we know v_0=1.4 \, m/s but we don't know v anymore! All we know is that it should be greater than the 2.34 m/s you found in part a). So solve the equation for v.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K