What Is the Strongest Material for Constructing Spaceships?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the strongest materials suitable for constructing spaceships, focusing on properties such as tensile strength, weight, and other performance factors relevant to space applications. Participants explore various materials, including metals, composites, and ceramics, and consider their implications for spacecraft design and construction.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest titanium as a strong candidate due to its strength-to-weight ratio, while others argue that steel has higher overall strength.
  • Carbon nanotubes are proposed by some as having high tensile strength, but their practical application in building walls is questioned.
  • Maraging steels are mentioned for their high yield strength and toughness, with some participants noting their potential for space applications.
  • Carbon composites are highlighted for their high tensile strength-to-density ratios, making them suitable for launch weight considerations.
  • Participants discuss the importance of impact resistance and other factors such as cost, availability, and durability in material selection.
  • Some suggest that the ideal material may need to be a combination of different materials to balance tensile and compressive strengths.
  • There is mention of using metals for long-term generational spaceships due to their ease of fabrication and repair, while lightweight materials may be suitable for disposable crafts.
  • One participant raises the idea that if spacecraft are built in space, the importance of material strength may diminish, focusing instead on the strength-to-weight ratio for materials launched from Earth.
  • Concerns about radiation protection are noted, with denser metals being favored for their protective qualities.
  • Some participants speculate on the potential of new materials or composites that could outperform existing options, but no specific solutions are agreed upon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the strongest materials for spacecraft, with no consensus reached. Disagreements exist regarding the comparative strengths of titanium and steel, the practicality of carbon nanotubes, and the best approaches for long-term versus short-term space missions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various factors influencing material choice, including tensile strength, weight, impact resistance, and the ability to withstand temperature fluctuations. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the performance of new materials and composites under different conditions.

Eridanus1
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
What is the highest tensile strength material known to man? can we use for builsing a spaceship or o neil habitat?

I think it has to be titanium based, but what is it. Is it possible to alloy titanium with something exotic like ---- e.g uranium? No?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I had to guess, I'd say carbon nanotube. Unfortunately, that's not something you can make walls out of.

Steel is stronger than titanium. The reason titanium is used in space applications is because it is relatively strong while being much lighter than steel.
 
Yeah, titanium is up there for a very good reason. Strength - toughness wise my favorite are maraging steels, have yield beyond 2000 MPa and still exhibit tolerable values of fracture toughness.
 
Well since the craft needs to be launched from the surface weight is important. Something like the carbon composities have very high tensile strength/density ratios.

Impact resistance is also important as evidenced from the last shuttle failure.

Well, unless you watch the discovery channel where they show wacky Troy Hurbertise (bearsuit guy) claiming he has a paste that would have saved the shuttle. :rolleyes: Of course Rude Goldberg was published but that was more entertainment merit where science and logic were removed for humor. Here is a photo that needs no caption as the infamous bearsuit guy demonstrates his material's fire resistance on TV.

Anyways, cost, availability, durability, resistance to temperature swings, et cetera are all factors that need to be addressed.

I would guess possibly some steel alloy may have the best tensile strength but some materials might find some exotic that surprasses that. Regardless, one parameter doesn't choose perfect material.

Cliff
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ROFL.. Oh man I didnt know MechE forum could be so much fun :smile: :smile:Edit: Since I don't want to be the next Tribdog on PF :smile: here is my input to this thread:

Concrete is good for compression forces but bad for Tensile forces. There is a delicate balance between those forces and their weight for space applications. Considering a complex system, some materials will be good for tensile strenght (carbon nanowires), and some would be good for compression forces. But as far as I know there is no material that's excellent for both - if there is they are patenting it as we speak
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm thinking of ceramic or foam based glass...it has to be heat proof too. Perhaps with a inner structure of carbon fiber.
 
MMCs etc. exotic composites do have favorable strength properties over a wide range of conditions (such as temperature), but the data I've seen usually predicts some problems toughness - wise. Don't know whether someone has overcome this (?) / how high toughnesses can be attained, and of course many problems can be avoided with intelligent enough design. Traditional carbon fibres have easily tensile strengths around 3.5 GPa (and way over), so no wonder use of composites would be a good choice.
 
Cliff_J said:
Well since the craft needs to be launched from the surface weight is important. Something like the carbon composities have very high tensile strength/density ratios.

Ideally, if you were building for interstellar travel in a mature technological environment, you'd try to manufacture as much of the ship as possible in orbit and obtain it from space based mines on asteroids and the moon and the like.

It isn't obvious to me, however, that spacecraft need to have exceedingly high tensile strength. The structure has to handle accelleration that can't be that much above 1G for a sustained basis, support a 1 atmophere externally directed pressure, provide meaningful radiation shielding, and handle micrometeorite impacts from the side with no added velocity due to the movement of the craft. If they are moving very fast, you'd probably be better off with a fairly modest strength main vehicle with those specifications and a frontal shield to handle high impact encounters. You can probably achieve those parameters with lead lined aluminium.
 
Last edited:
Depends on the application of the space ship.

If you're talking short term, disposable craft then you have a whole range of lightweight materials to use, such as plastics and various alloys. Pretty much what is used today.

If you're talking long term, "generational" spaceships where generations live there until they reach a destination star, then you're pretty much forced to use metals because they're the easiest to fabricate parts, repair and replace. Because of the mass of such ships, they will probably have to be built in orbit or a low G asteroid/moon/planet using raw materials mined on site.
 
  • #10
If you build the craft in space and launch it from space, strength is actually relatively unimportant for the craft itself. However, since the materials still need to be launched into space, weight (or rather, strength to weight ratio) is important. So that means an aluminum alloy or titanium.
 
  • #11
The density or weight of the metals won't be much of an issue if you mine them on site. It is however true that denser metals offer better protection against radiation than lighter ones like Al or Ti.
 
  • #12
Some ceramic-related ideas;



http://www.sglcarbon.com/gs/prodser/sigrabond/index.html

Alumina (Al203)

Macor

Shapal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
enigma said:
Steel is stronger than titanium. The reason titanium is used in space applications is because it is relatively strong while being much lighter than steel.

Now this can't be right because if titanium is really strong and much lighter than steel then titanium is stronger by mass.


The ideal material would most likely be an alloy of different stuff. If some way is found to glue carbon nanotubes into a material that has good compressive strength, maybe that flexible concrete stuff. Aerogel is the best insulator I know, save for a vacuum. Don't know about aerogel? Look it up on www.nasa.gov
 
  • #14
Titanium has a better strength to weight ratio than steel, but it's overall strength is less than that of steel. Granted overall strength is going to depend on what alloys you are looking at on bot the Ti and steel sides.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K