evalover1987
- 14
- 0
Homework Statement
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around determining the tangent space for a given matrix A, specifically focusing on 2x2 matrices and their rank properties. Participants explore the implications of matrix rank, determinants, and the characteristics of tangent vectors in this context.
The discussion includes various approaches to understanding the tangent space, with some participants suggesting paths to derive tangent vectors and others expressing uncertainty about the completeness of their contributions. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in identifying basis elements for the tangent space.
Some participants note constraints such as the requirement for matrices to be traceless and the implications of matrix rank on the dimensionality of the tangent space. There are references to external resources that some participants are unable to access.
arkajad said:I think that, excluding the zero matrix, for 2x2 matrices being rank 1 is equivalent to det(A)=0. That means tangent vectors are given by traceless matrices. That should be enough to solve your problem.
arkajad said:I was talking about tangent vectors - they should be traceless. See "http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/notes/diffdet/diffdet-600dpi.ps" ".
arkajad said:I was talking about tangent vectors - they should be traceless. See "http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/notes/diffdet/diffdet-600dpi.ps" ".
arkajad said:Another possible approach: A is of rank 1 if and only if there are unitary U,V such that
[tex]A=U\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix}V[/tex]
Therefore a path in rank 1 matrices can be described as
[tex]A(t)=U(t)\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix}V(t)[/tex]
Differentiating:
[tex]\dot{A}=\dot{U}U^{-1}A+AV^{-1}\dot{V}.[/tex]
Both [tex]\dot{U}U^{-1}[/tex] and [tex]V^{-1}\dot{V}[/tex]
are anti-hermitian. This gives you the general form of a tangent vector at A.
evalover1987 said:thanks for help, and I again apologize for my rudeness in the previous post
arkajad said:I was not very helpful. I tried to be, but I was too fast, and what I wrote is not yet a solution. But I think the solution is pretty close.
arkajad said:Take [tex]\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}[/tex]. Exponentiate it to get:
[tex]S(t)=\begin{pmatrix}e^t&0\\0&e^{-t}\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
Calculate
[tex]S(t)\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\1&1\end{pmatrix}S(-t)=\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\e^{-2t}&1\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
P.S. Still confused ...
arkajad said:I have made several corrections in my example, but the last version may even work.