What is the total flux flowing through a spherical Gaussian surface?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total electric flux through a spherical Gaussian surface with radius R/2, concentric to a uniformly charged insulating sphere of radius R, is calculated using Gauss' Law. The relevant equations include the volume of the sphere, Vsphere = (4∏R^3)/3, and the surface area, Asphere = 4∏R^2. The flux is determined to be Q/8ε0, where Q is the total charge enclosed within the Gaussian surface and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. This result is confirmed as correct based on the application of Gauss' Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of electric flux and charge distribution
  • Knowledge of the equations for the volume and surface area of a sphere
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and permittivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss' Law in various geometries
  • Explore examples of electric flux calculations in different charge distributions
  • Learn about the implications of permittivity in electrostatics
  • Investigate the relationship between electric field strength and flux through surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric flux and Gauss' Law applications in electrostatics.

CM Longhorns
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a uniformly charged sphere (an insulating sphere of radius R,) and a spherical Gaussian surface with radius R/2 concentric to the sphere. What is the total flux flowing through the Gaussian surface?

Homework Equations


Vsphere= (4∏R^3)/3
Asphere= 4∏R^2

Gauss' Law:
Flux = ρVinside/ε0 = PHI = QVinside/Voutside

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so I am familiarizing myself with these concepts, and I can't find a concrete example such as this one in the text. I'm pretty sure that simply by relating the equations for volume by Gauss' Law above can give me a compact expression for the Flux. BUT I'm not sure.
I gave it a shot by using the eqn above and simplified this expression to Q/8ε0. I am skeptical of its correctness. Can someone explain if I'm doing this correctly, and if so qualitatively describe why? Thanks! First post!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Resolved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K