MHB What is the Velocity of a Released Point Charge in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ISITIEIW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Physics
ISITIEIW
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I didn't know where i could post this problem, but you guys seemed the best for the job :p

A point charge q1=+120nC, is fixed in space and can not move. A second point charge, q2=+6nC, is initially held at rest 1 m away from charge q1. Charge q2, is then released from rest. How fast will charge q2 be moving when it is 7m away from charge q1? The mass of q2 is 17g and you may ignore the effects of gravity.

Alright so the answer is 0.0255 m/s, but i can never get this,

I did that the sum of the forces in the x direction are, k being 8.85e-12, r being 1m , and m being 0.017kg (kq1q2)/(r)^2=ma

I can solve for a then substitute this into the kinematic equation vf^2 = vi^2 +2ad
where vi would be 0, and solve for vf, and d would be 6 m. But does not give the correct answer.

What am i doing wrong ?? Please help
Thanks a lot!

ISITIEIW
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The kinematics equation you are using to find the final velocity applies to constant acceleration only. You are going to need to integrate due to the changing acceleration with respect to position.
 
Or it might be easier to use Conservation of Energy.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top