What is the width of a rectangle given pressure, mass, and length of one side?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the width of a rectangle given pressure, mass, and the length of one side. The pressure is specified as 8 kPa, the mass as 10 kg, and one side length as 1.2 m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between pressure, force, and area, with one participant attempting to derive the width from the given values. Questions arise regarding the absence of acceleration in the problem statement and the validity of the calculated width.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original attempt at a solution. Some express uncertainty about the correctness of the derived width and seek clarification on the problem's details.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is from a 9th-grade physics test and includes a second part regarding how pressure changes if the width is doubled. There is a suggestion that additional information may be required to resolve the confusion surrounding the calculated width.

rrrrrr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Pressure is 8 kPa, mass is 10 kg, length of one side of rectangle is 1.2 m
Find width of rectangle

Homework Equations


P=F/A
N = kg * m * s^-2

The Attempt at a Solution


8kPa = (10kg * 10m/s) / (1.2 m * X m) /// X is the unknown width

8000Pa = 100N / 1.2X m^2

8000Pa * 1.2m * Xm = 100 N

X m = 100N / 9600 m * N/m^2

X m = 0.01 m

Wrong -- width won't be 0.01 m!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure there is no given acceleration ?
 
rrrrrr said:

Homework Statement


Pressure is 8 kPa, mass is 10 kg, length of one side of rectangle is 1.2 m
Find width of rectangle
Hi rrrrrr, Welcome to Physics Forums!

Your attempt at solution was logical given a likely interpretation of the given information in the problem statement, yet you claim that the answer you arrived at was wrong. Perhaps there's something missing from the problem statement that could shed light on this?

While we can guess at a likely scenario, it would be better if you could provide explicit detail so there's no confusion. Always endeavor to make your statement of the problem as clear and complete as you can.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: meyol99
Mevludin Licina said:
are you sure there is no given acceleration ?
Thank you for responding - there was nothing about acceleration.
 
What is your basis for saying that the width cannot be 0.01 m? You must have more information of some kind...
 
gneill said:
Hi rrrrrr, Welcome to Physics Forums!

Your attempt at solution was logical given a likely interpretation of the given information in the problem statement, yet you claim that the answer you arrived at was wrong. Perhaps there's something missing from the problem statement that could shed light on this?

While we can guess at a likely scenario, it would be better if you could provide explicit detail so there's no confusion. Always endeavor to make your statement of the problem as clear and complete as you can.

Thank you for responding. The question is from a test in an introductory physics course in 9th grade. What we wrote here is our guess at how to solve it.
The whole question just read that "A body of rectangular shape applies to a surface a pressure of 8kPa. The mass of the body is 10 kg and its length is 1.2 m.
A) What is the width of the body?
B) How will the pressure that the body exerts on the surface change if the width of the body is doubled?
 
rrrrrr said:
Thank you for responding. The question is from a test in an introductory physics course in 9th grade. What we wrote here is our guess at how to solve it.
The whole question just read that "A body of rectangular shape applies to a surface a pressure of 8kPa. The mass of the body is 10 kg and its length is 1.2 m.
A) What is the width of the body?
B) How will the pressure that the body exerts on the surface change if the width of the body is doubled?
Okay! That's a much better problem statement :approve:

With that information it seems that your solution to part (A) for the width is fine.
 
gneill said:
Okay! That's a much better problem statement :approve:

With that information it seems that your solution to part (A) for the width is fine.
Thank you very much. We weren't sure of the result.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K