What is the wire's linear charge density from a proton?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a proton orbiting a long charged wire, with the goal of determining the wire's linear charge density based on the proton's orbital characteristics, including its frequency of revolution and radius of orbit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between forces acting on the proton and the equations governing circular motion and electric fields. There is confusion regarding the correct use of the period and frequency in calculations, as well as the proper setup of equations to isolate the linear charge density.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for correcting the approach and clarifying the use of variables. There is recognition of potential errors in unit conversion and the interpretation of given values, but no consensus on a final answer has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using the correct frequency instead of period and ensuring that all units are consistent. There is also mention of a typo that may have affected calculations.

Bigworldjust
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A proton orbits a long charged wire, making 1.30*10^6 revolutions per second. The radius of the orbit is 1.20cm.

What is the wire's linear charge density?

Homework Equations



- q E = m w^2 r
- 9*10^9 [2 λ /r] q = m w^2 r

The Attempt at a Solution



λ = linear charge dens
w = 2pi/period = 2pi/T
w = d theta/dt = 1.4* 2pi /1

I'm confused on how to solve for λ here though. Can anyone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You said you know:
F=m v^2/r=m r ω^2=mr(2π/t)^2
F=q E= q 2 k λ/r

You correctly said that you have to set them equal to each other
2qkλ/r=4π^2mr/t^2
You were given r and t. q, k, and m are known physical constants. The only unknown variable is λ. Just solve for it and plug in numbers.
 
frogjg2003 said:
You said you know:
F=m v^2/r=m r ω^2=mr(2π/t)^2
F=q E= q 2 k λ/r

You correctly said that you have to set them equal to each other
2qkλ/r=4π^2mr/t^2
You were given r and t. q, k, and m are known physical constants. The only unknown variable is λ. Just solve for it and plug in numbers.

Ah, okay, so I have it set up like this:

(2*1.6*10^-19*9*10^9*λ)/(.012)=(4π^2*1.67*10^-27*.012)/(1.30*10^6)^2

I got 1.95056*10^-33 nC/m but that seems to be wrong, anywhere I went wrong?
 
Last edited:
Don't plug in numbers until the final answer. Solve for λ, then plug in numbers. Also, just because it's small doesn't mean it's wrong.
 
frogjg2003 said:
Don't plug in numbers until the final answer. Solve for λ, then plug in numbers. Also, just because it's small doesn't mean it's wrong.
Alright so I got λ = 2π^2mr^2/kqt^2. I plugged in the numbers and got the same answer as before though, lol.
 
Ok, you got the same answer. Why did you think it was wrong?
 
frogjg2003 said:
Ok, you got the same answer. Why did you think it was wrong?

I submitted it through Mastering Physics and it said it was wrong, lol. I'm not sure if its the units because the answer is suppose to be in nC/m, but I am pretty sure it cancels out accordingly. Hmm..
 
I see the problem. You weren't given the period, you were given the rotation speed. "1.30*10^6 revolutions per second"
 
frogjg2003 said:
I see the problem. You weren't given the period, you were given the rotation speed. "1.30*10^6 revolutions per second"

Oh, so I have to convert the rotation speed to its period? So it would be 1/1300000?
 
  • #10
Or you could use the frequency 1.6*10^6 instead of 1/period. Either way, you're multiplying by (1.3*10^6)^2 instead of dividing.
 
  • #11
frogjg2003 said:
Or you could use the frequency 1.6*10^6 instead of 1/period. Either way, you're multiplying by (1.3*10^6)^2 instead of dividing.

Hmm I got 5.57*10^-33 and that still seems to be wrong, lol.
 
  • #12
Let's go back to the equation that you found:
\lambda = \frac{2\pi^2mr^2}{kqt^2}
Replace t by 1/f to get
\lambda = \frac{2\pi^2mr^2f^2}{kq}.
Now, what you have been plugging in as t (1.6*10^6s) isn't t, it's the frequency f (1.6*10^6 Hz). Also, make sure that when you're plugging in units, you're using only base units. Only m should be in kg, r should be in m, f should be in Hz, k should be in N*m^2/C^2. Your answer should be in C/m.
 
  • #13
frogjg2003 said:
Let's go back to the equation that you found:
\lambda = \frac{2\pi^2mr^2}{kqt^2}
Replace t by 1/f to get
\lambda = \frac{2\pi^2mr^2f^2}{kq}.
Now, what you have been plugging in as t (1.6*10^6s) isn't t, it's the frequency f (1.6*10^6 Hz). Also, make sure that when you're plugging in units, you're using only base units. Only m should be in kg, r should be in m, f should be in Hz, k should be in N*m^2/C^2. Your answer should be in C/m.
Alright I got 8.439 nC/m and that is still wrong, lol. Damn, I don't know where I'm going wrong. I'm plugging in everything:

I got:
m = 1.67*10^-27 kg
r = .012m
f = 1.6*10^6 Hz
k = 9*10^9 N*m^2/C^2
q = 1.6*10^-19 C
 
  • #14
That's because I had a typo and I wrote 1.6 MHz instead of 1.3 MHz.
 
  • #15
frogjg2003 said:
That's because I had a typo and I wrote 1.6 MHz instead of 1.3 MHz.

Ah, I finally got it. Thanks a lot for all of your help, I really appreciate it.
 
  • #16
You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K