What Is the X Coordinate of the Particle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The x coordinate of the particle at 50 seconds is calculated using kinematic equations, specifically Equation 2: x = x0 + v0(t - t0) + (1/2)a(t - t0)². The initial conditions are x0 = 20 feet and v0 = 20 feet/second at t0 = 30 seconds. The acceleration, determined to be -3 feet/second², is crucial for accurate calculations. The final position at 50 seconds results in x = -180 feet, confirming the teacher's assertion that -40 is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, particularly Equation 2 for position calculation.
  • Knowledge of initial conditions in motion problems, including x0 and v0.
  • Ability to calculate acceleration from velocity and time.
  • Familiarity with interpreting time intervals in physics equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in physics.
  • Learn how to calculate acceleration from velocity changes over time.
  • Explore the concept of reference points in motion problems, specifically t0.
  • Practice solving similar problems involving time intervals and position calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to motion and acceleration.

Meadman23
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The graph below represents the time versus velocity of a particle. The x coordinate of the particle at 30 seconds is 20 feet.

What is the x coordinate of the particle at 50 seconds?

Homework Equations


These are the equations I think could be used to solve this problem; the class hadn't been exposed to much else at this point.

Eq. 1 v = v0 + at

Eq. 2 x - x0 = v0t + 1/2at2

Eq. 3 v2 = v20 + 2a(x - x0)

Eq. 4 x - x0 = 1/2(v0 + v)t

Eq. 5 x - x0 = vt + 1/2at2

The Attempt at a Solution


The teacher told us that the answer to this problem is -180 but definitely NOT -40.

My method went like this:

I assumed when the problem asked me for the x coordinate, it meant x as in position, but not x as in the x and y-axis on the graph below. From that, I set out to solve this problem using equation 2 and setting it up for final position like so:

x = v0t + 1/2at2 + x0

then since I knew I didn't have the acceleration for this problem, I tried to find it:

a = -40 - 20 / 50 - 30 = -3ft/s

once I got the acceleration of -3ft/s I added my known values to the equation I setup:

x = 20*50 + (1/2*-3)502 + 20

and then I got:

x = 1000 + (-3750) + 20 = -2730

I've honestly tried a lot of other ways including trying to calculate the acceleration of the first point on the graph and then substituting that for my a and that gave me weird answers also.

6928nb.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meadman23 said:
I assumed when the problem asked me for the x coordinate, it meant x as in position, but not x as in the x and y-axis on the graph below.
Yes, that's right. :approve: The x-component of the graph below is time. But the "x" that you are looking for is distance. So you are right. :smile:
From that, I set out to solve this problem using equation 2 and setting it up for final position like so:

x = v0t + 1/2at2 + x0
Just make sure you are careful about how to interpret t in your equation. You are starting at t0 = 30 sec, not zero seconds. So everything needs to be done with respect to t0 = 30 sec as a starting point.
then since I knew I didn't have the acceleration for this problem, I tried to find it:

a = -40 - 20 / 50 - 30 = -3ft/s
'Looks good to me! :approve:
once I got the acceleration of -3ft/s I added my known values to the equation I setup:

x = 20*50 + (1/2*-3)502 + 20
Try it again, but this time be more careful about how you interpret t. The conditions x0 = 20 ft, and v0 = 20 ft/sec are true when t = 30 sec (not when t = 0 sec). You need to subtract off 30 sec from t to make sure everything lines up. In other words,

x = x0 + v0(t - 30) + (1/2)a(t - 30)2
 
Dude...WOW. I can't believe after countless hours all I needed to do was calculate the change in time. Thank you SO much!

As a clarification though, whenever I see t in a formula, does that mean I'm always supposed to find t - t0? I never thought to do that because nothing I read up to this point seemed to suggest I should, that is unless I was trying to calculate the change in t as part of the formula to find average speed or average acceleration.
 
Meadman23 said:
Dude...WOW. I can't believe after countless hours all I needed to do was calculate the change in time. Thank you SO much!

As a clarification though, whenever I see t in a formula, does that mean I'm always supposed to find t - t0? I never thought to do that because nothing I read up to this point seemed to suggest I should, that is unless I was trying to calculate the change in t as part of the formula to find average speed or average acceleration.
Essentially, yes. One way to write that particular kinematics equation is

x = x0 + v0t) + (1/2)at)2,

which is another way of saying,

x = x0 + v0(t - t0) + (1/2)a(t - t0)2

[Edit: Just make sure you understand what t0 is. The constant t0 is the specific time, within the interval of uniform acceleration, that that x = x0 and v = v0.]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K