From a broad perspective, if you know the electrical properties of the wire, and the transport limit it will operate at 1Volts, the emerging view in the electronic transport community is that electric field does not have any significance, and all limits (Diffusive, Quasi-Ballistic, Ballistic) can in principle be treated by a more general framework.
But since you are a beginner, and we are talking about BIG things, you can assume (while being aware of it) that you wire (since it's 1 meter) will operate in the diffusive (Ohmic) transport regime.
In this regime, current flow can be divided up into two distinct parts (Drift and diffusion), a feat that cannot be achieved in quantum transport.
Traditionally, drift current is caused by the electric field you are describing. And if carrier densities are uniform (no doping gradient etc...) in your conductor you can write the current as:
I_{total}=I_{drift}= q \mu_n E n_s
mu_n is the mobility [cm^2/ V.s]
E is the electric field [V/cm]
ns is the electron density per unit length [1/cm]
and q is the electron charge [C]
But as I said, with the breakthrouhgs in the theory of mesoscopic conductors people found other ways to describe current flow without necessarily talking about electric fields.
This became inevitable (rahter than a convenience) because current flow when there's NO SCATTERING (i.e, operation in the ballistic limit) cannot be explained by Ohm's Law - which assumes there's enough scattering in the conductor that we could talk about a mobility expression. Mobility is proportional to the time it takes before a carrier is scattered back from its original direction, and in the ballistic limit this time becomes "infinite"... Because there's no scattering.
Then Ohm's Law fails to describe anything that operates close to this limit... Why electric field needs to be discarded in the process is a subtle issue and requires some few hours of lectures to convey.
nanohub.org is an excellent place to start.