What is wrong with my formula?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cpwang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of moments for a cut-off standard distribution using a specific formula involving calculus. The user attempts to derive the moments, \( M(2j, \bar{R}) \), through a series of equations but finds discrepancies in the results for various values of \( \bar{R} \). The conclusion drawn from the calculations, \( M(2j, \bar{R}) = (2j - 1)! M(0, \bar{R}) \), is found to be empirically incorrect, particularly for \( \bar{R} \) values below 1, between 1 and 6, and above 7, indicating a misunderstanding in the application of the formulas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with statistical concepts, particularly moments of distributions.
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their behavior in mathematical contexts.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical equations and inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of moments in probability theory to clarify their behavior in cut-off distributions.
  • Study the convergence of integrals involving exponential functions to understand the impact of limits on calculations.
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating integrals to validate analytical results.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in calculus related to improper integrals and their convergence criteria.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students engaged in advanced calculus or probability theory who are working on distribution moments and their applications.

cpwang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am new here, so I have also attached my formula using pdf here.

I am trying to calculate the moments of a cut-off standard distribution. The question is pure calculus in nature. Please see the attached file.

I need to calculate:
\begin{equation}
M(j, \bar{R}) \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\bar{R}}^{+\bar{R}} z^j e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}} dz;
\end{equation}
Here is how I proceeds:
\begin{align}
M(2j, \bar{R}) & = (2j-1)M(2j-2, \bar{R}) - \frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \bar{R}^{\frac{2j - 1}{2}} e^{-\frac{\bar{R}}{2}} \\
& = (2j - 1)! (M(0, \bar{R}) - \frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{\bar{R}}{2}} \sum_{k=1}^{j} \frac{1}{(2k - 1)!} \bar{R}^{\frac{2k - 1}{2}}); \\
X \equiv & 2 e^{-\frac{\bar{R}}{2}} \sum_{k=1}^{j} \frac{1}{(2k - 1)!} \bar{R}^{\frac{2k - 1}{2}}:
\frac{d X}{d\bar{R}} = e^{-\frac{\bar{R}}{2}} {\bar{R}}^{-\frac{1}{2}} (1 - \frac{1}{(2j - 1)!} \bar{R}^{\frac{2j}{2}}); \\
z \equiv \sqrt{{\bar{R}}}: & X = \int \frac{d X}{d\bar{R}} d\bar{R}
= 2 \int_{0}^{\sqrt{{\bar{R}}}} e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}} (1 - \frac{1}{(2j - 1)!} z^{2j}) dz; \\
M(2j, \bar{R}) & = (2j - 1)! (M(0, \bar{R}) - M(0, \sqrt{{\bar{R}}})) + M(2j, \sqrt{{\bar{R}}}); \\
M(2j, \bar{R}) & - (2j - 1)! M(0, \bar{R}) = M(2j, \sqrt{{\bar{R}}}) - (2j - 1)! M(0, \sqrt{{\bar{R}}});
\end{align}
The last formula should no longer depends on $\bar{R}$. Because when $\bar{R}$ approaches $\infty$, $M(2j, \bar{R})$ approaches $(2j-1)!$ while $M(0, \bar{R})$ approaches 1, the conclusion of the above formula is:
\begin{equation}
\label{eqn: uncertainty moment 3}
M(2j, \bar{R}) = (2j - 1)! M(0, \bar{R});
\end{equation}
Unfortunately, this conclusion is empirically wrong. I did numerical calculation up to 200 terms, and found:
  • When $\bar{R}$ is below 1, $M(2j,\bar{R})$ decreases rapidly with j
  • When $\bar{R}$ is below 6, $M(2j,\bar{R})$ increases exponentially with j
  • When $\bar{R}$ is above 7, $M(2j,\bar{R})$ increases faster than exponentially with j

Where have I made an mistake?

This problem has troubled me for a few days, because I know the result is wrong, but could not find why.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am attaching your work as an image so that those who cannot read pdf files can see your work:

View attachment 1974
 

Attachments

  • cpwang.png
    cpwang.png
    20 KB · Views: 98

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
406
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K