What kind of bosons can have Bose-Einstein Condensation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) occurs in certain bosons, such as rubidium atoms, while others like photons and phonons do not exhibit BEC due to the conservation of particle number. In systems where the total number of particles is not conserved, such as with photons and phonons, the chemical potential approaches zero at the critical temperature (T_c), preventing significant clustering in the ground state. The behavior of phonons in materials like SrTiO_3 illustrates that the quantization method influences whether phonons can exhibit BEC, highlighting the importance of the system's symmetry and the definition of particle conservation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bose-Einstein condensation principles
  • Familiarity with bosons and their properties
  • Knowledge of phonons and their role in solid-state physics
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and particle statistics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conditions for Bose-Einstein condensation in different bosonic systems
  • Explore the role of chemical potential in phase transitions
  • Study the properties of phonons in various materials, particularly ferroelectrics
  • Investigate the implications of particle number conservation in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying phase transitions and the behavior of bosonic particles in various systems.

paradoxwst
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I notice that some bosons can exhibit Bose-Einstein condensation while others cannot (photons, phonons). Is it true that the bosons can have BEC only when the total number of particles is conserved? In this case, the chemical potential approaches zero at T_c, and particles begin to cluster (significantly) in the ground state.

Btw, is the total number of phonons conserved in a system? If it is not, for photons and phonons, \mu=0 as particles are not conserved. Thus, no BEC?

What distinguishes between photons and some other bosons such that the total number of particles can be conserved or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for phonons that depends also somewhat on definition. Consider as an example some ferroelectric material like Sr Ti O_3. At elevated temperatures, the Ti atom sits on the mean in the center of an octahedron defined by the oxygen atoms. At lower temperatures the system changes from cubic symmetry to some lower symmetry and the Ti atoms are on the mean not in the center of gravity of the oxygen atoms. You may describe the situation in two different ways: In the first description, you quantize the motion always around the corresponding equilibrium position. It is clear that at lower and lower temperatures the number of phonons decreases and there is no BEC.
In the second point of view you always quantize the motion around the center of the octahedron. Then, the expectation value of the phonon field phi does not vanish in the ground state of low symmetry, <0|phi|0> neq 0, and you could describe this as a BEC of the phonons.
 
DrDu said:
You may describe the situation in two different ways: In the first description, you quantize the motion always around the corresponding equilibrium position. It is clear that at lower and lower temperatures the number of phonons decreases and there is no BEC.
In the second point of view you always quantize the motion around the center of the octahedron. Then, the expectation value of the phonon field phi does not vanish in the ground state of low symmetry, <0|phi|0> neq 0, and you could describe this as a BEC of the phonons.

So it means whether there is phonon BEC depends on how you quantize the system? But does it have any physical implications whether there is BEC or not? Is the ambiguity a particular trait of phonons (quasiparticles)? Rubidium atoms have BEC regardless of how you describe it right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K