symbolipoint said:
You ask, is it true that with degree in Physics from M.I.T. that someone would have a hard time finding a job at a museum?
What I intend to say is that NO. Simply that I have faith that such a person would not have difficulty finding a job at a museum. I have this faith because this graduate has a fine education from a very well established, high quality school, and is necessarily both very educated and very intelligent; and certainly can communicate well.
No, that person's academic credentials are not sufficient by themselves to land her a job in a science museum. I gave several reasons why in Post #54. To follow up on Reason (4) in that post, even if she were a well qualified candidate, that doesn't mean she was the
best qualified candidate. Suppose the hiring manager was a Harvard grad, and another candidate had a BS in physics from Harvard (which would give her an edge over the MIT grad because personal biases come into play), was fluent in five languages, had volunteered as a science tutor for the inner-city kids of Boston, ...
And, on the flip side, I reiterate my caveat about being overqualified for certain positions. Proper fit is important.
Or it could be simply a matter of personal chemistry during the interview. What one hiring manager might perceive as novel and charming, another hiring manager might perceive as contrived and overly cutesy.
But, as I posted above, we have no details on what the position was and why she was rejected. So it's important for the OP not to draw any conclusions from this video ... particularly about the career opportunities with a physics degree or about the significance of a diploma from a name-brand school.