What makes this email so special?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the significance of punctuation in written communication, illustrated through humorous examples and anecdotes. Participants explore how punctuation can drastically alter the meaning of sentences, share jokes related to punctuation, and reference literature on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Humorous

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight how rearranging punctuation can change the meaning of sentences, using examples of letters addressed to "John."
  • Others share jokes that illustrate the importance of punctuation, such as the panda joke related to a wildlife manual.
  • Several participants mention the book "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" by Lynne Truss, discussing its entertaining take on punctuation.
  • One participant humorously discusses altering punctuation in biblical texts, noting the absence of punctuation in the original manuscripts.
  • There are playful exchanges about the complexity of certain sentences, with participants sharing examples that challenge conventional punctuation rules.
  • Some participants engage in light-hearted banter about the weight of "quality" joke books compared to regular ones, attributing weight to the intellectual quality of the content.
  • There are attempts to create complex sentences that play with punctuation, leading to discussions about the necessity of conjunctions and other grammatical elements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of punctuation, but there are multiple competing views on how it should be applied and interpreted in various contexts. The discussion remains playful and exploratory without reaching a consensus on specific grammatical rules.

Contextual Notes

Some examples presented rely on humor and may not adhere to strict grammatical conventions. The discussion includes playful experimentation with punctuation that may not reflect standard usage.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in linguistics, writing, humor, or the nuances of grammar and punctuation may find this discussion engaging.

  • #31
Chi Meson said:
Punctuate this!

The following CAN make a proper sentence.

John where Jim had had had had had had had had had had had the best effect on the teacher.
Is this correct?
John, where Jim had had 'had', had had 'had had'; 'had had' had had the best effect on the teacher.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
arildno said:
Is this correct?
John, where Jim had had 'had', had had 'had had'; 'had had' had had the best effect on the teacher.

This is what I had suggested, but I'm not especially happy with it. I'm sure Chi has a better answer.
 
  • #33
Oops, sorry for nicking your semi-colon idea Gokul..:redface:
 
  • #34
Gokul43201 said:
This is what I had suggested, but I'm not especially happy with it. I'm sure Chi has a better answer.

Uh, no. THat's about it. I didn't say it was a great sentence. I came up with that in the seventh grade (1977), although I don't think it was entirely original. We were learning the past-perfect tense, and my friends and I tried to see haw many "had"s we could string together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 340 ·
12
Replies
340
Views
32K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K