What physics programs should I add to my TI-84Plus?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the use of programs for the TI-84 Plus calculator in physics courses. While some participants suggest adding programs for fun, the consensus leans towards minimal reliance on calculators for introductory physics. The recommendation is to perform calculations by hand and utilize lab workstations for complex numerical analysis, emphasizing the importance of understanding fundamental concepts over tool dependency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with TI-84 Plus calculator functionalities
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts, including one-dimensional motion and thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of programming for lab workstations
  • Experience with numerical analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore programming options for the TI-84 Plus calculator
  • Research effective hand-calculation techniques in physics
  • Learn about complex numerical analysis methods
  • Investigate lab workstation tools for physics simulations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching introductory physics, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of physics calculations and lab work.

Ryantruran
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My professor told us we are allowed to use a TI calculator and that if wanted to we could add programs to it. What programs do you thank I should add. we covered everything from one dimensional motion to basic thermodynamic stuff?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no one?
 
I wouldn't add any program for intro physics; I would add any program just for fun.
 
You may not like my answer (I'm an academic), but you shouldn't use a calculator for more than finding the sine of an angle and the like. You should be doing everything by hand. The types of problems that you can't do by hand (complex numerical analysis), you should be doing on a lab workstation using mostly code you write yourself.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
556
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
741
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
866
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K