It is often said that the Bell's theorem precludes local hidden variables. From a "modern" point of view one should never deduce conclusions from the existence of outputs in non commutative measurements.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It seems that the derivations of this theorem use such results.

Is there a proof which uses only the ##\lambda## in the case of possible measurements?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A What should hidden variables explain?

Loading...

Similar Threads - should hidden variables | Date |
---|---|

I Should the energy density of the vacuum be zero? | Jan 21, 2018 |

I Hidden dimensions and quadratic term of a free field | Dec 2, 2017 |

I Should the position basis be quantized? | Sep 17, 2016 |

I When should one eigenvector be split into two (same span)? | Apr 25, 2016 |

I What specific momentum should be used in the matter wave? | Apr 11, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**