What substitution/manipulation was done here?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 1K views
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
I've attached the image with this post. It looks fairly simply to go from the first line to the second line and almost like a uv substitution, but I tried plugging it in and playing around with the integral and cannot get the exact answer. I really feel like something's just going over my head or that I'm missing a step. Regardless, any help would be great!

Note: mu is the mean.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-06-09 at 1.43.15 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-06-09 at 1.43.15 PM.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
I've attached the image with this post. It looks fairly simply to go from the first line to the second line and almost like a uv substitution, but I tried plugging it in and playing around with the integral and cannot get the exact answer. I really feel like something's just going over my head or that I'm missing a step. Regardless, any help would be great!

Note: mu is the mean.

If ##\mu## is the mean, and ##f## is the pdf, then isn't ##\mu = \int xf(x)dx##?
 
By infinity limits the integral is the same for each value of ##\mu##. Are you post all informations?
 
Last edited:
[itex]\mu[/itex] is a constant. Therefore [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\mu^2f(x)dx=\mu^2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)dx=\mu^2[/itex].

Also [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\mu xf(x)dx=\mu\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xf(x)dx=\mu^2[/itex].