What Torque is Needed to Spin a 250g Disk to 2000 RPM in 4.5 Seconds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyclemun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk Spin Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the torque required to accelerate a 250g plastic disk to 2000 RPM in 4.5 seconds. The correct approach involves using the formula for torque, T = Iα, where I is the moment of inertia and α is the angular acceleration. The moment of inertia for a solid disk is calculated as I = 1/2Mr², resulting in I = 0.00125 kg·m². The angular acceleration is determined to be 46.54 rad/s², leading to a required torque of 0.0582 Nm, correcting the initial miscalculation of 0.06 Nm.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and torque
  • Familiarity with the moment of inertia for solid objects
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and acceleration conversions
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations related to rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about angular acceleration and its relationship with torque
  • Explore the conversion between RPM and rad/s for rotational motion
  • Study practical applications of torque in electric motors
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of rotational motion and torque calculations.

cyclemun
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 250 g , 20.0-cm-diameter plastic disk is spun on an axle through its center by an electric motor.

Homework Equations


What torque must the motor supply to take the disk from 0 to 2000 rpm in 4.50 s?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that Torque = Inertia times angular acceleration or T = Ia.
I tried using the formula for inertia of a solid disk, I = 1/2Mr^2. So with that I get 1/2(.25)(.1^2) = .00125. Then i found angular acceleration: 2000 rpm = 209.44 rad/s divided by 4.5 s so 209.44 rad/s / 4.5s = 46.54 s^2. I multiply these two number together and get .00125*46.54 = .06 Nm. However, this is wrong. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your working seems correct to me...
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K