I What type of problems do you like the most?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter bigmike94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Type
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on preferences for different types of problem-solving in physics and mathematics. Many participants express a preference for problems that provide specific values to find unknowns, as they feel these resemble puzzles and yield satisfying, tangible results. Conversely, problems that require derivation or proof, such as "show that" or "prove that," are generally viewed as less satisfying, often due to the perceived lack of practical application or enjoyment. Some participants also highlight a dislike for conceptually simple but mathematically tedious problems. Overall, the enjoyment of problem-solving is closely tied to personal interest in the subject matter and the nature of the problems presented.
bigmike94
Messages
99
Reaction score
61
TL;DR Summary
Which sort of problems do you get the most pleasure from solving
There’s many types of problems in textbooks for example conceptual problems, problems where you’re given values and asked to find an unknown value and also problems that start with “show that..” “give x can you show y” “derive an equation in terms of…”

Im curious as to what type you like solving the most and what type is less satisfying.

For me I prefer to be given values about a situation and be asked to find an unknown.

I like trying to picture the situation and thinking about what needs to be known to find the value I am looking for.

It feels like a puzzle and for me it’s highly satisfying, especially because you’re looking for an actual real number something you can think “oh that makes sense” or maybe “I’m not sure this is right why would a particle be moving at 500 coulombs per Newton”🤣

And the least satisfying for me has to be the type that start with “show that..” “prove that..” “derive an equation in terms of..”

I just don’t feel like I am getting much from them, I mean you can say I am bias because I struggle with them but even when I can solve them or check the solution I get near zero satisfaction.

On the other hand learning the theory and following derivations and using all this to solve a real problem just hits the sweet spot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I enjoyed the problems in my Optics classes the most. Probably because I was very interested in the topic, unlike other classes.
 
I like solving conceptual problems, especially paradoxes.
 
Demystifier said:
I like solving conceptual problems, especially paradoxes.
This is what I need to sit down and spend time with. I think because I’m still studying first year physics I’m just too impatient and really want to get onto the next level. So I just ignore all the discussion/conceptual questions.
 
I like most problem solving but I find that one type that I DON'T like is where the problem is conceptually straightforward but algebraically (or otherwise mathematically) tedious.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top