What Unanswered Questions in Cosmology Are Scientists Neglecting?

[Inverse-Square-Law]

Thank you for my induction into such an honored forum.

I am here to ask some hard questions that either don't have answers yet or are neglected by the scientific community because of their potential to change current understandings of cosmology

Thank you

 

[Nugatory]

Welcome... but please do check out the forum rules about speculation and unpublished theories.

 

[Inverse-Square-Law]

Nugatory, I am doing so as marcus states, "probably the most convenient way to get that is to properly understand the balloon analogy."

Many of my theory's seem to undermine such a model, my point of view can sometimes be construed as not following the standard LCDM (Lambda-cold-dark-matter) model as a starting point for I have good reason not-to follow such a model.
Thus the reason I joined such a group, to get feedback on some of the ideas that I have and to see if they can be falsified through logic and mathematics and set up a new reasoning in understanding the universe...

 

[phinds]

Nugatory, I am doing so as marcus states, "probably the most convenient way to get that is to properly understand the balloon analogy."

I recommend the link in my signature for a full explanation of the balloon analogy

Many of my theory's seem to undermine such a model, my point of view can sometimes be construed as not following the standard LCDM (Lambda-cold-dark-matter) model as a starting point for I have good reason not-to follow such a model.

Not acceptable here unless you can find support for them in peer-reviewed papers

Thus the reason I joined such a group, to get feedback on some of the ideas that I have and to see if they can be falsified through logic and mathematics and set up a new reasoning in understanding the universe...

We do not discuss non-standard "theories", since they always turn out to be nonsense.

This forum is for the discussion of established science, not for attempting to break new ground.

 

[Inverse-Square-Law]

ALWAYS? Well I guess this isn't the place for actual science when accepted models can-be falsified through mathematics, logic and reason but hey, if you guys don't want to follow where actual science goes in the time of informational accessibility, then I'll take my theories elsewhere where they don't just throw out actual physics that can falsify the current model.

 

[sysprog]

I'm not a moderator/mentor -- I'm pleased to be allowed to be a regular member -- even so, I'd like to chime in with the observation that the rules that @Nugatory advised you to read are administered with sincerity, and seriously, without rancor, but they are enforced. If you can't find a legitimate peer-reviewed journal that advances a theory that is substantially similar to yours, it's probably best to refrain from trotting that theory out in the open on PF. If you're in any doubt about whether something's ok to post, you can ask a Moderator/Mentor via private conversation, and you'll be appropriately advised. And welcome aboard the Physics Forums.

 

[phinds]

Well I guess this isn't the place for actual science ...

By "actual science" I take it you mean attempts to modify / improve existing models. If so then, yes, we ALWAYS don't do that. You agreed to EXACTLY those rules when you signed up here.

You are like a man who orders meat in a specifically signed vegan restaurant and are angry at the restaurant because you didn't read the sign on the way in.

 

[Vanadium 50]

then I'll take my theories elsewhere

Excellent. If you are doing "actual science", then you should publish it in "actual journals".

 

[berkeman]

Excellent. If you are doing "actual science", then you should publish it in "actual journals".

Well said. And on that note, we can close this introductory thread.