What Value of t Makes N(t) Equal to 250?

  • Thread starter Thread starter needingtoknow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation N(t) = 500 / (1 + 9e^(-5t)) for the value of t that results in N(t) equaling 250. The correct transformation of the equation leads to 9e^(-5t) = 1, which simplifies to e^(-5t) = 1/9. The solution involves taking the natural logarithm of both sides, leading to the correct calculation of t. Missteps in applying logarithmic functions were identified as a common source of confusion in the problem-solving process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions, specifically natural logarithms
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of solving equations involving exponentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential decay functions
  • Learn how to apply natural logarithms in solving equations
  • Practice solving similar equations involving exponential growth and decay
  • Explore the implications of logarithmic transformations in real-world applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus or algebra, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in exponential equations.

needingtoknow
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What value of t will make the function = 250?

N(t) = 500 / (1+9e^(-5t))
250 = 500 / (1+9e^(-5t))

The Attempt at a Solution



1 + 9e^-5t = 2
9e^-5t = 1
t = log1/log(-5)(9e)
t = 0

However t = 0 is incorrect because when it is subbed back into the original equation it does not result in 250. How do I solve for the correct value of t?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is difficult to follow. Everything up to your second step checks out, but I can't understand how you went from the second equation to the third. The third equation also seems completely senseless. You can't take the natural logarithm of a negative number in the real number line.

If you show your full transition from the second step to the third, we might be able to help you better. But a wild guess from my head suggests that you are somehow misreading the second equation, so I will write it down nicely: [itex]9e^{-5t} = 1[/itex]. Did that help?
 
Your are correct to this point:

9e^(-5t) = 1

You didn't apply logarithms correctly after this. Here is how to proceed correctly:

e^(-5t) = 1/9
Mod note: Deleted the remainder of this post, as it was probably too much help.[/color]
Now take the natural log of both sides:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K