What Is the Value of the Infinite Sum \(3 \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2k^2-k}\)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the value of the infinite sum \(3 \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2k^2-k}\). Participants are exploring the convergence and evaluation of this series, which falls under the subject area of infinite series and calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the series by substituting \(k = t/2\) but faces issues with the summation limits. Some participants question the validity of this substitution, noting that it does not account for the integer nature of \(k\). Others suggest that partial fraction decomposition could be a more straightforward approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the implications of the substitution made by the original poster and exploring alternative methods to evaluate the sum. There is a recognition of the need to address the counting of terms correctly, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of partial fractions and the Harmonic series.

Contextual Notes

There is a concern regarding the proper treatment of the summation index when substituting variables, as well as the need to clarify the setup of the series to avoid errors in evaluation.

Rectifier
Gold Member
Messages
313
Reaction score
4
The problem
I'd like to calculate the value of this sum:
$$3 \sum^\infty_{k=1}\frac{1}{2k^2-k}$$The attempt
## 3 \sum^\infty_{k=1}\frac{1}{2k^2-k} = [k=t/2] = 3 \sum^\infty_{t=2}\frac{1}{2 \left( \frac{t}{2} \right)^2-\frac{t}{2}} = 3 \sum^\infty_{t=2}\frac{1}{ \frac{t^2}{2} - \frac{t}{2}} = 3 \sum^\infty_{t=2}\frac{2}{t^2-t} = \\ = 6 \sum^\infty_{t=2} \frac{1}{t(t-1)} = [partial \ factoring] = 6 \sum^\infty_{t=2} \frac{1}{t-1} - \frac{1}{t} = \\ = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 6 \sum^n_{t=2}\frac{1}{t-1} - \frac{1}{t} =\\ = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 6 \sum^n_{t=2} \left( \frac{1}{2-1}-\frac{1}{2} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{3-1}-\frac{1}{3} \right) + ... + \left( \frac{1}{(n-1)-1}-\frac{1}{n-1} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{n-1}-\frac{1}{n} \right) = \\ = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 6 \sum^n_{t=2} \left( \frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{2} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{3} \right) + ... + \left( \frac{1}{n-2}-\frac{1}{n-1} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{n-1}-\frac{1}{n} \right) = \\ = [telescoping \ series] = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 6 \sum^n_{t=2} 1 -\frac{1}{n} = 6 ##

But I get the result 6ln(2) from wolfram. Where did I make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you put k = t/2 without being careful about the summation set ... since k is an integer you should only sum over even t.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rectifier
May I ask how I can bypass that error?

## 3 \sum^\infty_{k=1}\frac{1}{2k^2-k} = [k=t/2] = 3 \sum^\infty_{t=2}\frac{1}{2 \left( \frac{t}{2} \right)^2-\frac{t}{2}} ##
 
Rectifier said:
May I ask how I can bypass that error?

## 3 \sum^\infty_{k=1}\frac{1}{2k^2-k} = [k=t/2] = 3 \sum^\infty_{t=2}\frac{1}{2 \left( \frac{t}{2} \right)^2-\frac{t}{2}} ##
You confused the counting width here, but you do not need the substitution. The partial factoring works without. Then write down a few terms and you should see what the sum is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rectifier
Rectifier said:
May I ask how I can bypass that error?

## 3 \sum^\infty_{k=1}\frac{1}{2k^2-k} = [k=t/2] = 3 \sum^\infty_{t=2}\frac{1}{2 \left( \frac{t}{2} \right)^2-\frac{t}{2}} ##

Let ##H(N) = \sum_{n=1}^N 1/n## be the Harmonic function; see, eg.,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_series_(mathematics)

Let $$S(N) = \sum_{k=1}^N 1/(2k^2-k).$$
Expand ##1/(2k^2-k)## into partial fractions and note that one of the parts of ##S(N)## involves the sum of the odd reciprocals from ##1## to ##2N-1##, that is ##S_{\text{odd}}##:
$$S_{\text{odd}} =\sum_{k=1}^N 1/(2k-1).$$
This is the sum of all reciprocals from 1 to ##2N##, less the sum of the even reciprocals from 2 to ##2N##; the latter can be expressed in terms of ##H(N)##. Thus, we can express ##S(N)## exactly in terms of ##H(N)## and ##H(2N)##. The limit as ##N \to \infty## is then do-able.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K