Formal definition of limits as x approaches infinity used to prove a limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit as t approaches infinity of the function (1-2t-3t^2)/(3+4t+5t^2) is proven to be -3/5 using the formal epsilon-delta definition of limits. The discussion emphasizes finding a suitable N such that for all ε > 0, if t > N, then the absolute value of the difference between the function and -3/5 is less than ε. The participants clarify the need to manipulate the expression to fit the formal definition, ensuring that both the numerator and denominator do not equal zero within the defined limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and the formal epsilon-delta definition
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their behavior as x approaches infinity
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly limits at infinity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn how to manipulate rational functions for limit proofs
  • Explore examples of limits approaching infinity with different polynomial degrees
  • Practice proving limits using the epsilon-delta definition with various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits, mathematicians, and educators looking to enhance their understanding of formal limit proofs.

aegiuscutter
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


use the formal definition to show that lim as t goes to infinity of (1-2t-3t^2)/(3+4t+5t^2) = -3/5


Homework Equations



given epsilon > 0, we want to find N such that if x>N then absolute value of ((1-2t-3t^2)/(3+4t+5t^2) + 3/5) < epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution


i assume that X>N>0 and that the numerator and denominator can't be equal to zero.
do i have to limit the domain? not sure how to proceed from here

absolute value of ((1-2t-3t^2)/(3+4t+5t^2)) < epsilon - 3/5
absolute value of (-(3t+1)(t-1)/5t^2+4t+3)) < epsilon -3/5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For this problem, begin by massaging your |f(x) - L| into the form x>N so that you will get a particular value of N which may work.

Then re-state your definition except say \forall ε&gt;0, \exists N = something \space | \space x &gt; something \Rightarrow |f(x)-L| &lt; ε

Then proceed to prove that the particular value of N you found satisfies the definition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K