copernicus1 said:
I've been trying to decide if Bernoulli's equation is more fundamental than the continuity equation, but I'm not actually able to derive the latter from the former (so far), so I'm gathering that maybe Bernoulli's equation is less general---maybe Bernoulli's equation is applicable in the realm of incompressible flow while the continuity equation is more general?
Bernoulli's equation
[itex]\frac{1}{2}\rho v^{2} + \rho g h + P = \text{const.}[/itex]
Is true for incompressible fluids, though there are other equations that hold for compressible fluids.
The continuity equation in differential form
[itex]\frac{d \rho}{d t} = -\nabla\cdot (\rho \vec{v})[/itex]
or integral form
[itex]\frac{d M}{d t} = -\oint\rho \vec{v}\cdot d\vec{a}[/itex]
Where M is the total mass of fluid inside a closed surface,
applies to all fluids, compressible and incompressible alike. They can't necessarily be derived from one another, though if there were a continuity equation for energy (which there almost certainly is, but I'm not a fluids expert), I bet you could get Bernoulli's equation out of that.
So I guess in a sense the continuity equation is more fundamental than Bernoulli's equation, since if you could find one for the energy of a fluid, you would get Bernoulli's equation out of it with the right constraints.