What Water Pressure is Needed to Generate 2kW with 1.6 Liters per Second?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matthewgill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To generate 2kW of electricity with a waterwheel using a flow rate of 1.6 liters per second, a minimum pressure differential of 1.25 MPa is required, assuming water is incompressible. This calculation is based on the formula Pressure = Power / Flow. Considering efficiency, if the turbine operates at an isentropic efficiency of 80%, the inlet pressure must be approximately 227 psig to achieve the desired output. Frictional and electrical losses in the system must also be accounted for to ensure accurate performance estimates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics and pressure differentials
  • Knowledge of turbine efficiency and performance metrics
  • Familiarity with electrical power generation principles
  • Basic proficiency in using spreadsheets for calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of frictional losses in waterwheel systems
  • Learn about the different types of turbines and their efficiencies
  • Investigate methods for measuring and optimizing water pressure
  • Explore electrical loss factors in power transmission systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, renewable energy enthusiasts, and anyone involved in designing or optimizing waterwheel systems for electricity generation.

matthewgill
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I require 2000W of Electricity from a waterwheel (which can be any size). I only have 1.6 litres-per-second MAX, but any pressure.

What pressure of water will I need to turn that waterwheel so it produces 2kW with 1.6 litres of water per second?

If possible, please take efficiency into account, specify the size of wheel you have chosen and explain how you’ve done it.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you can have any pressure it doesn't matter what kind of waterwheel you use. You can get any amount of energy out of it.
 


I mean, there is no maximum. But obviously I would like to keep it as low as possible and still produce the 2kW with the 1.6 litres p/s... otherwise I am wasting the excess unnecessary energy...
 


Pressure = Energy / Volume = Power / Flow = 2000/1.6E-3 = 1.25 MPa pressure differential.
So there's your theoretical minimum. Assuming water is incompressible.
 


Those are odd constraints. You aren't confusing static fill pressure with the dP across the turine, are you?
 


I don't believe so, no.

For russ_ watters : what do you calculate the minimum pressure required to be if I needed 2000W and only had 2.5litres per second of water?
 


1.6/2.5 the first answer...

efficiency is another matter and depends how you define it...simple way is to assume a steady state rotation at fixed revolutions...
the water wheel has frictional losses and any generator has electrical losses...
including heat...likely you can find typical generator or alternator losses online...how much a typical water wheel loses in efficiency might be difficult to find...Sounds like you are delivering power locally but if it's distributed over long distances I believe half the power might be lost in transmission lines...virtually none is lost in wiring if power is delivered all local and is not stepped up and down via transformers with their own losses...
 


alxm said:
Pressure = Energy / Volume = Power / Flow = 2000/1.6E-3 = 1.25 MPa pressure differential.
So there's your theoretical minimum. Assuming water is incompressible.

This formula is ok providing the coeficient is 100 %. Good for first approximation.
 


Hi matthew'. So tell us about the use for this thing. How are you getting the water pressure? Why 1.6 liters per second?

The first law of thermo reduces to Hin - Hout = work for an expander/turbine. Throw efficiency into the mix...

If I assume an outlet pressure of 0 psig and an isentropic efficiency of 80% (fairly nominal for typical turbines) then I get an inlet of 227 psig needed to produce the 2 kW. I had to do a few conversions to my spreadsheet and this is only a 2 minute analysis, so there's a chance I screwed something up but I think it's ok.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K