What would be the best equation to find momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lphockey14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the best equations for calculating momentum. The primary equation highlighted is p = mv, which defines momentum (p) as the product of mass (m) and velocity (v). Another relevant equation mentioned is F = dp/dt, which relates force (F) to the rate of change of momentum. The conversation also touches on the units of momentum, which are kilograms multiplied by meters per second (kg*m/s). Additionally, a more complex equation, E^2 - (pc)^2 - p^2c^4 = 0, is introduced, indicating a connection to relativistic momentum. Overall, the key focus is on understanding momentum through its fundamental definitions and equations.
lphockey14
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
what would be the best equation to find momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably Use

\vec p = m \vec v
Or

\vec F =\frac{d\vec p }{dt}
 


Originally posted by lphockey14
what would be the best equation to find momentum?

The momentum of what? Given what? The definition of momentum of a particle is

\mathbf{p} = m\mathbf{v}

Once you know the mass and the velocity you know the momentum.
 
What are the units momentum is measured in?
 
Originally posted by Guard
What are the units momentum is measured in?

Momentum is measured in kilogram*meters/second (kg*m/s)
 


Originally posted by lphockey14
what would be the best equation to find momentum?


E^2 - (pc)^2 - p^2c^4 = 0
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces not real just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I What part of momentum moves the boat in the inclined plane paradox experiment?
Replies
12
Views
1K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Conservation of Angular Momentum vs a gyro at the North Pole
Replies
16
Views
1K
B I don't get instantaneous impulse
Replies
2
Views
1K
B The inclined plane paradox (proved)
Replies
16
Views
1K
B Conservation of momentum and conservation of energy details
Replies
30
Views
3K
I Is angular momentum perpendicular to fixed axis of rotation constant?
Replies
1
Views
1K
B K Energy & Momentum: Driving Force or Lost Heat?
Replies
12
Views
1K
B Conservation of momentum in a closed system
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Why is KE not conserved when momentum is?
2
Replies
53
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top