What Would Happen if the Earth Was Flat and There Was No Gravity?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samtheham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hypothetical Thinking
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores a hypothetical scenario where the Earth is flat and gravity does not exist, but instead, the Earth and celestial bodies accelerate upwards at 1g (9.8 m/s²). Participants examine the implications of dropping a pen in this context, focusing on the perceived effects of acceleration versus gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the Earth is flat and accelerates upwards, a dropped pen would maintain its current speed.
  • Another participant argues that the pen would not appear to accelerate, thus it would not seem as if gravity existed.
  • A different viewpoint states that for an observer accelerating with the flat Earth, the pen would appear to accelerate downwards, but this perception is due to the observer's upward acceleration.
  • One participant proposes that an experiment could determine the nature of acceleration, questioning the motivation behind the original question and suggesting it may relate to flat Earth advocacy.
  • Another participant expresses suspicion about the intent behind the question, indicating a concern that it may be linked to flat Earth theories.
  • In response to the skepticism, a participant defends the scenario as a legitimate basis for discussing general relativity, noting the difficulty in distinguishing between acceleration and gravity without comparative measurements.
  • Further, it is mentioned that the current Earth model suffices for understanding gravity without needing to consider a flat Earth scenario.
  • One participant clarifies that their suspicion was not an accusation of flat Earth advocacy but rather an observation based on the nature of the question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the hypothetical scenario, with some questioning the validity of the premise and others defending its relevance to discussions of general relativity. There is no consensus on the motivations behind the question or the interpretations of the scenario.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of acceleration and gravity, and the implications of a flat Earth model. There are unresolved questions regarding the experimental validation of the claims made.

samtheham
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the Earth was flat, and there were no such thing as gravity, and it, along with all the celestial bodies, accelerated upwards (so, parallel to normal) at 1g(9.8m/s^2), what would happen if I dropped a pen while I am on earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pen would maintain it's current speed.
 
gravity

So, it'd still seem that gravity existed, right?
 
no,the pen wouldn't accelerate therefore,it wudnt seem as if gravity existed
 
For a casual observer who is accellerating with this flat earth, the pen would appear to be accellerating down.
But that is because the observer is accustomed to being accelerated upwards by the Earth under his feet, not because the pen actually is going down.
 
You could actually do an experiment and determine that you were accelerating and the pen was the "inertial frame". However, I would have to ask the question: why would you ask this question? It almost seems like something the Flat Earth Society would do to try and get a bunch of "physicists" to support their views.
 
I have the same suspicion as StatMechGuy.

Zz.
 
So harsh guys! This is the legitimate basis of general relativity. It would be very difficult to distinguish this kind of acceleration from "gravity" (you'd need to compare measurements from separated places, much as were used the first time to show we don't live in a discworld).
 
cesiumfrog said:
So harsh guys! This is the legitimate basis of general relativity. It would be very difficult to distinguish this kind of acceleration from "gravity" (you'd need to compare measurements from separated places, much as were used the first time to show we don't live in a discworld).

Yeah, but one doesn't need to do that on a "flat" earth! An ordinary Earth that we have right now is pretty sufficient, don't you think?

Furthermore, I don't think we were being "harsh". All I said was I had a "suspicion". It wasn't an accusation. If I think truly believe this is nothing more than a flat-earth advocacy, do you think this thread would have survived till now?

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K