What would happen in Planetary Collision?

AI Thread Summary
A collision between two large planetary masses, like Earth, would render magnetic forces negligible compared to gravitational forces, meaning the collision would likely occur without significant alteration. The discussion emphasizes that the strength of a planetary magnetic field is vastly weaker than that of a strong magnet, which would have no noticeable effect during such an event. To move Earth from its orbit, the size and velocity of thrusters would depend on the desired orbital change and the time available, with current technology suggesting that asteroid fly-bys might be a more feasible option. Using thrusters within Earth's atmosphere would be ineffective unless they are designed to push air out, as ground movement would counteract any gain. Overall, innovative solutions like space fountains or removing the atmosphere are proposed as potential methods for effective orbital adjustments.
Quantumsatire
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
What would happen if two large planetary masses (such as our earth) collided by their poles (ie, north hits north)? Would the repellent magnetic force be negligible compared to the masses and gravity, or would the collision be altered or averted?
Also, while I am thinking about it, what size and velocity thrusters/engines and there required placement, would we need to move Earth from its orbit?
Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic field would be completely negligible. As a simple test, take a strong magnet and let it fall down. Do you note any effects of its magnetic field? Compared to a planetary magnetic field, the field strength in that magnet is of the order of 10 000 times stronger.

Also, while I am thinking about it, what size and velocity thrusters/engines and there required placement, would we need to move Earth from its orbit?
Depends on the size of change you want, and the available time. Close fly-bys by asteroids look more reasonable with (extrapolations of) current technology. In general, think big. The Earth has a mass of about 6000000000000000000000000kg...
 
On a related note, would using thrusters within the atmosphere even do anything? It seems like you'd be pushing the ground one way and the air the other way, leading to no gain unless you were pushing air out of the atmosphere somehow.
 
Drakkith said:
On a related note, would using thrusters within the atmosphere even do anything?
At a level where we use thrusters (reaching escape velocity!) to change the orbit of earth, lifting them above the atmosphere (with Space fountains, inflatable towers or just balloons) is probably not an issue :D. Alternatively, remove the atmosphere first.
 
mfb said:
Alternatively, remove the atmosphere first.

Dibs on the atmosphere. I have plans that require it...
 
Oh, thanks! And that Space Fountain Idea sounds pretty cool.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top