Undergrad What would the world be like if c→∞ and h=0?

Click For Summary
If the speed of light were infinite and the Planck constant zero, the universe would be entirely Newtonian, leading to significant instability in atomic structures, resulting in no matter as we know it. Objects would emit unlimited energy and fail to reach thermal equilibrium, creating a chaotic environment. The development of relativity and quantum mechanics was necessary because classical Newtonian mechanics cannot fully explain the complexities of our universe. While some theoretical adjustments might allow for certain quantum effects, many fundamental issues remain unresolved. Overall, this hypothetical scenario highlights the limitations of Newtonian physics in describing reality.
GW150914
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
What would the world be like if the speed of light is infinity and the Planck constant is zero (therefore the world is totally Newtonian)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you say, totally Newtonian.
 
In that world, several things would happen that don't happen in the real world that we live in:
- All atoms would be unstable, so there would be no matter as we know it.
- Even if there was some way of getting around that unstable atom problem, objects would radiate unlimited amounts of energy and would never come into thermal equilibrium with their surroundings.
...
And so on, through a long litany of problems.

The physicists of the early twentieth century didn't invent relativity and quantum mechanics because they were sadistic and wished to inflict pain on future generations of physics students. They invented relativity and quantum mechanics because (although it works really well in many areas) classical Newtonian mechanics doesn't completely explain the universe we live in.
 
Nugatory said:
In that world, several things would happen that don't happen in the real world that we live in:
- All atoms would be unstable, so there would be no matter as we know it.
- Even if there was some way of getting around that unstable atom problem, objects would radiate unlimited amounts of energy and would never come into thermal equilibrium with their surroundings.
...
And so on, through a long litany of problems.

Perhaps for these problems we only need h=0. I think for QED one can safely take c to infinity, since lattice QED with small enough spacing should be compatible with all QED experiments. I think the chiral fermion problem is one issue about which we don't yet know whether it is safe to take c to infinitity.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
635