Undergrad What would the world be like if c→∞ and h=0?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion explores the hypothetical implications of setting the speed of light (c) to infinity and the Planck constant (h) to zero, resulting in a completely Newtonian universe. Key conclusions include the instability of all atoms, leading to the absence of matter as we know it, and the inability of objects to reach thermal equilibrium due to unlimited energy radiation. The conversation emphasizes that the development of relativity and quantum mechanics was essential to address the limitations of classical Newtonian mechanics in explaining the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of the speed of light and Planck constant
  • Basic principles of thermal equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of setting the Planck constant to zero in quantum field theory
  • Explore lattice quantum electrodynamics (QED) and its compatibility with theoretical models
  • Investigate the chiral fermion problem in quantum mechanics
  • Study the historical context and development of relativity and quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum mechanics and relativity.

GW150914
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
What would the world be like if the speed of light is infinity and the Planck constant is zero (therefore the world is totally Newtonian)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you say, totally Newtonian.
 
In that world, several things would happen that don't happen in the real world that we live in:
- All atoms would be unstable, so there would be no matter as we know it.
- Even if there was some way of getting around that unstable atom problem, objects would radiate unlimited amounts of energy and would never come into thermal equilibrium with their surroundings.
...
And so on, through a long litany of problems.

The physicists of the early twentieth century didn't invent relativity and quantum mechanics because they were sadistic and wished to inflict pain on future generations of physics students. They invented relativity and quantum mechanics because (although it works really well in many areas) classical Newtonian mechanics doesn't completely explain the universe we live in.
 
Nugatory said:
In that world, several things would happen that don't happen in the real world that we live in:
- All atoms would be unstable, so there would be no matter as we know it.
- Even if there was some way of getting around that unstable atom problem, objects would radiate unlimited amounts of energy and would never come into thermal equilibrium with their surroundings.
...
And so on, through a long litany of problems.

Perhaps for these problems we only need h=0. I think for QED one can safely take c to infinity, since lattice QED with small enough spacing should be compatible with all QED experiments. I think the chiral fermion problem is one issue about which we don't yet know whether it is safe to take c to infinitity.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
761