Real-Life Applications of Logarithms

AI Thread Summary
Logarithms are essential for managing a wide range of numerical values, particularly in fields like telecommunications where they simplify the representation of signal strengths using decibels (dB). They serve as the inverse of exponential functions, allowing for the solving of equations that involve exponentials, such as determining unknowns in equations like 3^x = 87. Logarithms also facilitate linearization of data in physics and chemistry, making it easier to fit curves to experimental results. Additionally, they are commonly used in various scientific disciplines, including particle physics and thermodynamics, where they help represent large-scale changes and fundamental quantities like entropy. Understanding logarithms is crucial for applying them effectively in real-world scenarios.
cracker
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Ok I have taken Geometry, Algebra one and two and have 2 more days of pre cal left and I have been worken with logs and stuff like solveing, simplyfing and factoring them but I never found out what they are for... I know how to solve the problems but what do they apply to in real life?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Logarithms are extremely useful for dealing with numbers that have a wide range. Like radio signals, for example. When you transmit hundreds of kW (kiloWatts) of power, the electric field strength by the transmitting antenna is very large. But many miles away, the signal strength has dropped to a very tiny value. The best way to deal with such wide-ranging numbers is to talk in logs, or powers of 10. The unit of a dB (decibel) is based on logs:

V[dB] = 20 * log (V)

or for dealing with power:

P[dBm] = 10 * log (P/1mW) (for dB above a milliWatt).

So every power of 10 decrease in the amplitude of a voltage or field strength, you get a -20dB decrease in the value. And for every power of 10 increase in the power, you get a +10dB increase. It's a lot easier many times to deal with dB instead of powers of 10.

And different bases are used for specialized logs, like base e for natural logs, or ln.
 
Last edited:
The most important mathematical application of logarithms is to solving equations involving exponentials. For b> 0, logb(x) is defined to be the inverse function to f(x)=bx. Because of that, log_b(b^x)= x and b^{log_b(x)}= x. It is also helpful that we can always change from one base to another:
3^x= 2^{log_2(3^x)}
= 2^{x log_2(3)}
and log2(3) is just a number.

For example, I can solve the equation 3x= 81 by taking the logarithm, base 3, of both sides: log3(3x)= x= log3(81)= 4 so x= 4. (I know log3(81)= 4 because I know 81= 34 so log3(34)= 4.)

That's what log is: it's the "opposite" of the "exponential" or power function, bx.
Of course, here I could just have written 3x= 81= 34 so, by comparing exponents, x= 4. But what if the problem were 3x= 87 where 87 is not a simple integer power of 3? In that case, I can use either "common logarithm" (base 10) or "natural logarithm" (base e, about 2.718) to get
log_10(3^x)= log_10(87)
so
x log_10(3)= log_10(87)
and
x= \frac{log_10(87)}{log_10(3)}
The point of using "common logarithm" (or "natural logarithm") is that my calculator (in fact the calculator included with Windows that I'm running now) has both common log and natural log keys: log10(87)= 1.9395192526186185246278746662244 according to my calculator, and log10(3)= 0.47712125471966243729502790325512 so x is the quotient of those: x= 4.0650447521106626505692254480397, approximately, just a little larger than 4 which is what we expect since 87 is just a little larger than 81.
 
a log function is a non trivial function that changes multiplication into addition. More precisely, if f is a continuous real valued function defined for all positive reals, and if f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) for all x,y > 0, and if f(1) = 0, but f is not always zero, then f is a log functiion, and the base is the unique a>0 such that f(a) = 1.

i think this is right.
 
oooooohhhhh! Yeah yeah! Now I get it! LoL
 
One of the most important "real life" applications of logarithms has to do with linearizing things. If you ever get into physics (or chemistry, for that matter), you'll run into a lot of exponentials of linear functions of various quantities. Linearizing by taking a logarithm often allows for easier curvefitting of data.

If you ever get into particle physics, you'll notice that almost everything is plotted on a log-log scale. That's done in other places too, to display large scale changes more effectively. For example, often stock performance charts will be plotted with log scales.

Not to mention thermodynamics, where one of the most fundamental quantities, entropy, is actually the logarithm of multiplicity (with an appropriate scaling factor depending on your units).

But it's always good to understand the mathematics behind things like this, before worrying about how you can use them!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top